YOUNG-WOMEN Messages for November, 2002: Re: Male vs Female (a comment on Dr McIntosh)

Re: Male vs Female (a comment on Dr McIntosh)

From: Male (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 02:27:42 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: William McIntosh, MD: "Re: masterbation??"
Previous message: Male: "Re: Male vs Female (a comment on Dr McIntosh)"
In reply to: Anna: "Re: Male vs Female (a comment on Dr McIntosh)"
Next in thread: anonymous: "Re: Male vs Female (a comment on Dr McIntosh)"
Reply: anonymous: "Re: Male vs Female (a comment on Dr McIntosh)"

At Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Anna wrote:

>#3) No offense to the docs on this board, but any profession has a
>tendency to protect its own, no matter whether they actually did sth.
>wrong.
>
>My last word on this.
>Anna
>

Dear Anna, I do not sollicitate the continuation of this dialogue but I think that it is profoundly unethical to protect the sexual misconduct. Doctors in France have right to expose my wife completely naked (in the presence of students and even videocameras, as they are claiming right now), they have right to watch her undressing, to palpate her genitalia (not only gynecologists but also sexologists, allergologists etc) and it is legal because they say to do it for her health. If you have doubts about it everybody will tell you that you are not a doctor. Your only protection should be the medical community who should clearly state which conduct is correct and which is not. Now, as you have remarked the community protects the bad guy following the first principle of MEDICAL (i.e. not human) ethics: the unhonest patrician has priority with respect to an honest plebeian. This means that patients have no protection and a physician without scruples can sexually exploit patients practically without any risk.

I do respect enormous achievements of medical science, I admire the doctors who save lifes of people etc However, if the medical professionals keep protecting the voyeurism and sexual misconduct their community has no honorability.

--
Male

Next message: William McIntosh, MD: "Re: masterbation??"
Previous message: Male: "Re: Male vs Female (a comment on Dr McIntosh)"
In reply to: Anna: "Re: Male vs Female (a comment on Dr McIntosh)"
Next in thread: anonymous: "Re: Male vs Female (a comment on Dr McIntosh)"
Reply: anonymous: "Re: Male vs Female (a comment on Dr McIntosh)"

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote

use when must restrict search to only the young women's forum...
Enter search keywords:
	Returns per screen: Require all keywords: