![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: garding a Previous AnswerFrom: R. Daniel Braun, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:23:42 -0600 (CST)
At Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Alexa wrote: > >In a message posted on November, 13, 2000, Dr. Harvey S. Marchbein >stated the following: "Side effects with new pills may take a while to >clear up. Another option is some of the lower dose pills that have been >shown to be better for acne than than Ortho-Tricyclen. One might be >Alesse. At a lower dose, the major complaint is breakthrough bleeding >but that clears up on most women and the other side effects are usually >nil. >Hope this helps and write back anytime for more information. HSM" > >He suggests that Alesse has been shown to be better for acne than Ortho >Tri Cyclen. Is this true? I was on Alesse and had a clear face...on >Ortho, my face has acne, even though Ortho advertises for clear >complexions...Should I go back on the Alesse? > >If I do switch will the lower levels of estrogen in Alesse, when >compared to Ortho, create any problems. Also, since the progestin in >Alesse is an older one than norgestimate, will this be less effective >for acne? > >Lastly, if I do go back on Alesse, is there any way to get rid of body >acne, on the neck, back, and chest....I am allergic to many things, such >as erythromycin and clindymydin. Use what works best for you.
-- R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG FOG
|
|
Return to ![]()
POST A MESSAGE to this Forum
MAIL a message directly to this Forum: YOUNG-WOMEN@OBGYN.net
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 17:21:35 2008