![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Diagnosis of Fibroids vs. Adenomyosis: Is this a common mistake?From: Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sat, 30 Oct 1999 23:14:34 -0500 (CDT)
At Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Tracy wrote: > >Fibroids are fairly easy to diagnosis with bimanual pelvic exam and >confirm with x-rays such as MRI's, however according to literature it is >more difficult to diagnosis adenomyosis except with biopsy and >pathology. Is it common for a diagnosis of leiomyomas to be given and >surgically treated by hysterectomy, only to have the pathology report >indicate that there were no leiomyomas identified and only focal areas >of adenomyosis? I'm not aware of any study from pathology that compares the admitting diagnosis and discharage diagnosis. Leiomyomata are rather classic in appearance but may obscure the visualization of the myometrium in its entirety, thereby obscuring adenomyosis appearing myometrium.
>I haven't been able to find this area discussed in depth I don't believe it is common but certainly can happen.
>Also, the initial
-- Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. FACOG, FACS Great Neck, New York
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 06:20:03 2008