![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: am I 3 months or 6 weeks?From: Patti Tessler, FNP (anonymous@obgyn.net)Thu, 21 Oct 1999 11:28:07 -0500 (CDT)
At Thu, 21 Oct 1999, sue wrote: > >I Have always had irregular periods. I went off the pill in May, >skipped period in June, had one in July, and skipped August and >September. I took a pregnancy test in August that came out negative. >When I went to the doctor in Sept., they told me I was pregnant. Using >the usual method, they calculated me at almost 3 months. I didn't think >they were accurate because I had (and still have) NO symptoms! To make >an incredibly long story a little shorter, When I went to the doc for my >first ultrasound, he told me he couldn't see anything in my uterus. He >also said that there was a 75% chance that this isn't a viable >pregnancy. I went for a second ultrasound the next morning, and the >tech said that there is a sac in there (actually, what appears to be >3!), and I could only be 5 to 6 weeks -- and that's the reason why >nothing showed up on the first one. I am so confused! I go back to the >doc tomorrow for another ultrasound. Is it possible that they could be >so wrong about my dates? I have already prepared myself for the WORST, >but there is still maybe a glimmer of hope. Is there a chance this >could turn out in a positive way?? DOes anyone Know? >Thanks for listening! Dear Sue, For those of us with irregular periods, dating a pregnancy can be tricky business. It's possible that you got pregnant only six weeks ago, even though you didn't have a period. Continued monitoring of ultrasound (and perhaps blood tests) will help to establish an expected due date. I suspect you'll be on pins and needles until you see a heartbeat on ultrasound, and I hope your wait is short. Good luck!
-- Patti Tessler, BSN, MSN, RN, CS Family Nurse Practitioner
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 06:49:33 2008