search:

Re: gender selection

From: Alan (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Mon, 2 Aug 1999 21:19:57 -0500 (CDT)


At Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Nina wrote: >
>At Wed, 16 Jul 1997, Laurie wrote:
>>
>>At Wed, 16 Jul 1997, Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>At 10:14 AM 7/16/97 -0500, you wrote:
>>>>My husband and I have three girls and will be trying for baby number
>>>>four in the next year. We are seriously considering sperm seperation to
>>>>try to achieve a boy. Are there any other ways we could
>>>>achieve our goal? What do you think of sperm seperation?
>>>>
>>>If I may add to this, we have two boys and are in the same "boat". We want
>>>another baby and would love to have a girl, but either will be great. What
>>>about the Shettles Method?
>>>
>>>Jeff and Beth Harrell
>>>
>>>Beaching, Fishing,
>>>NASCAR Racing and
>>>Homeschooling in NC
>>
>>Our embryologist just reviewed this topic for us at my request. Here
>>are some of the studies he discussed:
>>
>>In a 1970 paper, Shettles claimed that sexual position, female orgasm,
>>vaginal pH, depth of penetration, and timing related to ovulation
>>affected the sex of the baby. He also reported that morphological
>>differences exist between "male" (Y-bearing) and "female" (X-bearing)
>>sperm. These findings have not been replicated. There are several
>>conflicting studies on timing of ovulation and sex of the baby, and more
>>sophisticated microscopic techniques have failed to find morphologic
>>differences in the sperm.
>>
>>Some studies have shown that (a) the use of Clomid and (b) cycles with a
>>longer follicular phase (which would be expected in Clomid cycles) have
>>a higher incidence of female births. Of course, other studies have
>>shown no difference.
>>
>>Ericcson in 1973 published an albumin separation method reported to
>>isolate Y-bearing sperm. He subsequently patented the method and it is
>>in commericial use. Several studies have since shown that use of this
>>method does not affect the sex ratio.
>>
>>Flow cytometry, another lab technique which involves staining and then
>>sorting the sperm, has been shown to affect the sex ratio. The problems
>>with this technique are (1) does the staining affect the subsequent baby
>>in any way and (2) sperm recovery is very limited, to the point of
>>requiring assisted reproductive techniques such as IVF/ICSI to achieve
>>pregnancy.
>>
>>Pre-implantation biopsy of embryos is also being more widely performed
>>(usually to prevent transmission of genetic conditions which affect
>>males vs. females), but it has the disadvantages of requiring IVF and
>>of risking the loss of the embryo.
>>
>>So what this boils down to is there's not a reliable, inexpensive method
>>for sex selection--and I wonder if that's all bad :-)
>>
>>--
>>Laurie Lovely, MD
>>RE fellow, UNC-Chapel Hill
>>
>--
>Hello Laurie,
>
>My husband and I have been doing some research and ran across your comments on the Ericcson 1973 study on albumin separation to isolate Y-bearing sperm. The clinic we have contacted claim hit rates of up to 75% for childs sex preselection. Would you be so kind as to pass on any of the references you mentioned citing poor success rates for this method ? I would like to have the clinic explain/refute those results. Many thanks.
>
>Nina B.
>

Nina,

My wife and I are considering a 4th child and would like a girl. We have 3 boys. Have you had any success with your clinic? Did they satisfactorily explain their claimed high success rate?

Do you know any organizations to contact for information regarding gender preselection?




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the women's health forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:
Return to [ Women's Health Forum ] Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 07:18:04 2009

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote

home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international
e-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer |

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved.
Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com