![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: 21cm x 16-1/2cm x 12cm uterine fibroidFrom: J.Glenn Bradley MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:15:59 -0500 (CDT)
At Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Marian wrote: > >I am 45 and have a very large fibroid. I am experiencing absolutely no >symptoms. An ob/gyn specialist has suggested surgery. Because of the >size of my fibroid, abdominal surgery will most likely be performed. >Since I am probably 5-7 years away from menopause, I would like to >explore other options for treating my fibroid. The diet prescribed by >Christine Northrup, M.D. in her book, Women's Bodies, Women's Wisdom, >is a method I would like to try or explore the option of drugs to reduce >the size. Is surgery absoltely necessary in my case? > >Instead of choosing majory surgery, I would like to "buy some time" and >explore other options. My hope is that when I reach menopause the >fibroid will shrink. The specialist has told me it will not shrink. It >is hard for me to elect surgery when, at this point, I have no symptoms. > >Thank you in advance for your feedback. I am trying to come to a >decision I am comfortable with. Uterine artery embilization is a relatively new minimally invasive procedure that is a "procedure" done in an xray department. The only drug therapy that will shrink fibroids is a GnRH agonist such as Lupron-Depo, and that is only temporary. If nothing is done you may incur acute degeneration in such a large fibroid necessitating emergency surgery. A complete overview of conventional approaches to fibroids can be found on my website medseek.com/glennbradley. Dr.B
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 06:48:37 2008