![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: ResuspensionFrom: Laureano (anonymous@obgyn.net)Fri, 28 May 1999 00:13:15 +0200
The amputation of cervix is considered less traumatic than histerectomy, not for fertility. The suspension of all pelvis organs are make like a floor, the cervix is down this floor so even if you repared this floor the cervix the is not repaired, just a little. Also when estrogen fall down the ratio cervix/uterine body get higher and many times the elongation of the cevix is more important than uterine body prolapse in the symptoms. The stats for long term depends on a lot of many risk, some of then not predeceable. Do you think a 60 Y-O woman who have made a stetic surgery in breast at 40, stiil being the same?. the stats are similar with or without histerectomy but many surgeons considered the reintervention much easier with the uterus in. Laureano Folgar ob/gyn especialist Hospital Comarcal Melilla MALAGA, SPAIN
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 06:19:01 2008