WOMENS-HEALTH Messages for March, 1999: Re: Placental Abruption

Re: Placental Abruption

From: Jill (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 08:48:08 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: mary: "Prevention of Post Surgical Adhesions Chat with David Wiseman, PhD"
Previous message: Elizabeth: "2 Questions"
In reply to: Jas: "Re: Placental Abruption"
Next in thread: Jas: "Re: To Jill >Placental Abruption"
Reply: Jas: "Re: To Jill >Placental Abruption"

JAS Again I thank you for your help. When did your doctor notice your seperation? What were your symptoms? At Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Jas wrote: >
>Jill I see that Mary has given you the link to my story. I think what
>she wanted you to see is that these abruptions do in fact heal
>themselves. If mine at just slight of 50% can heal so can your very
>small separation. In fact you would have an even better chance than I
>did. Don't despair, it is very early in the pg. The placenta has alot
>mor growing to do. The part that separated will form to clot and most
>likely be reabsorbed. When my separation occured they told me the
>biggest problem would be possible pretem labor and IGUR (interuterine
>retardation). They also told me that the problem of IGUR with
>separations would most likely manifest itself near 30 wks of pg at which
>time they will watch more closely on u/s. After my initial separation I
>had no further trouble with it. By 14 weeks my separated section of the
>placenta formed clot and was reabsorbing. I would be encouraged in your
>situation you most likely will not have to worry about IGUR. Think of
>it this way, if mine can be that large you even stand a better chance.
>My baby weighed a whopping 6pd 5 oz and the peri's in the L&D were
>floored not to mention in awe of her existence that she even made it to
>35 weeks. They lovingly named her miracle and me comeback kid!
>
>Best wishes to you and keep us all posted we are rooting for you!
>
>Jenn
>
>At Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Jill wrote:
>>
>>At Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Robert Radnich, M.D. wrote:
>>>
>>>I would assume that you are having some bleeding. A slight separation
>>>of the placenta is a common finding with first trimester bleeding. You
>>>have a slightly increased risk of miscarriage, but I do not feel that
>>>you would have an increased risk of c/section should you carry to term.
>>>Hope everything goes well for you.
>>>
>>>At Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Jill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I just found out at 5 weeks I had a slight seperation of my placenta
>>>>from my uterus. I have several questions. 1. Does this put me at risk
>>>>of having a moderate seperation at a later date? 2. Am I more at risk
>>>>of having a c section? 3. Because this seperation is so early in the
>>>>pregnancy will it heal instead?
>>>>
>>>>--Dr. Radnich are my chances real high of pre-term labor?
>>>>Jill Paiewonsky
>>>>
>>>--
>>>R.H. Radnich,MD,FACOG
>>>OB/GYN Associates of Dover
>>>540 S. Governors Ave.
>>>Dover, Delaware 19904
>>>
>>--
>>Jill Paiewonsky
>>

--
Jill Paiewonsky

Next message: mary: "Prevention of Post Surgical Adhesions Chat with David Wiseman, PhD"
Previous message: Elizabeth: "2 Questions"
In reply to: Jas: "Re: Placental Abruption"
Next in thread: Jas: "Re: To Jill >Placental Abruption"
Reply: Jas: "Re: To Jill >Placental Abruption"

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote

use when must restrict search to only the women's health forum...
Enter search keywords:
	Returns per screen: Require all keywords: