![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Dr. McIntosh***UGFrom: eliz (anonymous@obgyn.net)Mon, 1 Mar 1999 19:51:38 -0600 (CST)
>>Yes, it is a personal choice. I would remind you that there is no known dignificant hormone production in the uterus itself, only in the ovaries. >> >&& I've read the same, but would you agree, that like the brain, there >is still a lot of 'unknowns' and that perhaps the current instruments >are not sensitive enough? Sometimes it's not just the hormones, but the >balance in the pelvic area and the blood supply that help keep women >healthier? Some things are just less tangible..harder to identify. Have >you had women patients who asked for the uterus preserving surgery? How >did it go? I know what the docs say about hormones but the uterus does add something. I had a hysterectomy without ovary removal. The doc said nothing would change but it definitely has. I think you're onto something with the balance concept. I can tell the uterus is gone. It is a significant, negative change.
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 07:17:13 2009
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote
home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international