![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: tubaligationFrom: connie (anonymous@obgyn.net)Wed, 7 Oct 1998 11:26:56 -0500 (CDT)
At Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Sue wrote:
>
>At Thu, 20 Aug 1998, D. Ashley Hill, M.D. wrote:
>>
>>At Wed, 19 Aug 1998, Laura wrote:
>>>
>>>I am a 33 yr-old who is consider having a tubal
>>
>>It is almost always preferable for the husband to have a vasectomy, as
>>it is a less complicated procedure that does not require general
>>anesthesia or the risk (however small) of damage to the intestines,
>>major abdominal blood vessels, or bladder. Most tubal ligations done in
>>the US are done via laparoscopy. Although uncommon, there is some
>>evidence that having a tubal may cause some women to have "wacky"
>>periods. This has been called the "post tubal ligation syndrome." The
>>theory is that the procedure alters the blood supply to the ovary,
>>which, in my opinion, is unlikely from an anatomic standpoint. However,
>>some women *do* have abnormal periods after a tubal.
>>
>>Thus, when possible, the husband should get "clipped" and not the wife.
>>
>>Good luck with your decision.
>>
>>--
>>Ashley Hill
>>David Ashley Hill, M.D.
>>Associate Director
>>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
>>Florida Hospital Family Practice Residency
>>Orlando, FL
>>http://home.mpinet.net/dahmd
>>
>>The above is intended for general medical education,
>>and is not for specific medical advice.
>>I apologize, but I am unable to answer personal e-mail
>>due to time constraints.
>>
>I am one of many women who had suffered severe side effects after tubal
>ligation. I have been doing a lot of research on this subject and have
>discovered that these complications are more common than people realize.
>It is so obvious that the side effects, heavy bleeding, excruciating
>pain, etc. occur after the tubal and the emotional pain is also
>difficult as one goes from dr to dr until finally finding one (most
>don't) who believes in Post Tubal Ligation Syndrome. I think it is
>extremely important that women are warned of these complications prior
>to surgery so that we can make an informed choice. Myself and many
>others have had our lives seriously affected by having a tubal.
-- I'm 39 post tubal 2.5 years and in early menopause, with no family history. I suspected perimenopause one year ago--lots of bleeding,d&c=nothing, then no periods. My Md said no way. I believe there is a correlation between tubal/early menopause. I won't give up! Searching for info!
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Jul 2 06:50:02 2009
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote
home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international