![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: endometrial biopsy and false negative test resultsFrom: Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sat, 31 Jan 1998 22:21:00 -0600 (CST)
At Sat, 31 Jan 1998, Kelly Shanahan, MD wrote: > >At Sat, 31 Jan 1998, Sharon wrote: >> >>Recently I asked whether it was preferable to take pathology from tissue >>taken during a hysteroscopy or to do a D&C to determine whether >>treatment for hyperplasia has been effective. I have been diagnosed >>with endometrial hyperplasia and polycistic ovary syndrom (PCOS) that >>was discovered by an hysteroscopy that my doctor wisely insisted on even >>though an endometrial biopsy came back normal just six weeks earlier. >>Question: Given the false negative that came back on the endometrial >>biopsy before, when I complete my 4 month Provera treatment, can I rely >>on the results of another endometrial biopsy to accuratly show if the >>hyperplasia has been taken care of? My doctor mentioned that it is >>unusual for a endometrial biopsy to be so far off the mark, but has >>suggested that in my case we should do another hysteroscopy and take >>tissue for pathology, or a offce or outpatient D&C. Any suggestions on >>which of these two options would give me the best chance of accurate >>results? [My Thanks to Dr. Marchbein who provided great information to >>my previous posting] > >Hysteroscopy with directed biopsies is more accurate than endometrial >biopsy. First and foremost, with the hysteroscope we can see what we >are doing. If there is an abnormal appearing area, we can watch >ourselves biopsy it -- if we do a D&C, we can go back and check that we >actually sampled teh abnormal appearing area. Endometrial biopsies are >blind procedures and do not sample the entire uterine lining -- I like >to use this example: take a lightbulb and a small artists paintbrush. >Put the paintbrush in the lightbulb and rotate it. Can you "paint" the >entire inside of the lightbulb with a couple of twirls? NO. Just like >we can't sample every speck of uterine lining with an endometrial biopsy >-- I find them much more useful if something shows up, but I can't rule >out hyperplasia or even cancer in a small area if it is negative. > >Given your history, I'd recommend hysteroscopy and D&C. > >-- >Kelly Shanahan, MD, FACOG >S. Lake Tahoe, CA In your particuar case, the D&C with hysteroscopy may be the best choice due to "false negative' results previously, as Dr Shanahan stated. I just want to point out that for the majority of patients, the endometrial biopsy has replaced the D&C as a diagnostic tool and the literature substantiates this. A sonohysterogram done with an endometrial biopsy can also be very revealing by giving the thickenss of the endometrium and help the doctor delineate a possible "false negative".
-- Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. FACOG OBGYN.net U.S. Representative, New York Great Neck, New York http://www.obgyn.net/states/bios/marchbein.htm http://www.obgyn.net/women/advisors/harveym.htm
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 06:37:10 2008