![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Accuracy of Second Trimester UltrasoundsFrom: Stormy (anonymous@obgyn.net)Fri, 14 Nov 1997 12:32:40 -0600 (CST)
At Fri, 14 Nov 1997, Mary wrote: > >I understand that early first trimester U/S is most accurate for dating >a pregnancy and that late 3rd trimester U/S is less accurate for >estimating fetal size. > >How accurate is second trimester U/S for estimating fetal size? > >My situation: U/S at 20 weeks - femur, humerus, hand, foot, abdominal >circumference and BPD measurements all indicate 21.5-22.5 week size. >(LMP and conception dates are known.) Fetal weight was estimated at >16-18oz. > >>From what I have read, fetal size at 20 weeks is usually 10-12 ozs. > >Does the result of the U/S accurately reflect a large baby (or shall I >say ANOTHER large baby - my son was over 11lbs)? > >Also, no indication of GD at this time. 3hr GTT in Sept was normal. > >Thanks for any opinions on this. > >Mary,
>From what I understand, ultrasounds done between 18-22 weeks are most Hope this helps!
-- Stormy, RN, BSN
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 06:36:15 2008