![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Accuracy of Second Trimester UltrasoundsFrom: Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)Fri, 14 Nov 1997 09:45:02 -0600 (CST)
At Fri, 14 Nov 1997, Mary wrote: > >I understand that early first trimester U/S is most accurate for dating >a pregnancy and that late 3rd trimester U/S is less accurate for >estimating fetal size. > >How accurate is second trimester U/S for estimating fetal size? In between 1 and 3. No, really. It is.
>My situation: U/S at 20 weeks - femur, humerus, hand, foot, abdominal Maybe. Too early to tell. EFW (estimated fetal weight) is *give or take 10-15%* Size measurements have a 7-10 day variability so it's pretty close to what you got.
>Also, no indication of GD at this time. 3hr GTT in Sept was normal. For our listeners around the country, GD is gestational diabetes. If a big baby was had in a last pregnancy, a 3 hour GTT should be done first trimester (as soon as it can be arranges) and in the late second/early third trimester also. 11# babies ARE BIG!!
>Thanks for any opinions on this.
>Katherine Marie...due March '98 I guess Katherine Marie Harvey would be asking too much just for answering a few questions 8-)
-- Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. FACOG, FACS OBGYN.net U.S. Representative, New York Great Neck, New York http://www.obgyn.net/states/bios/marchbein.htm http://www.obgyn.net/women/advisors/harveym.htm
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 06:36:15 2008