Re: UROGYNECOLOGY: Rectocele repair/General or spinal anesthesia
For more information on symptoms and treatment of endometriosis visit www.EndometriosisZONE.org.
From: Amy Rosenman, M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:25:01 -0500 (CDT)
Message posted on Amy Rosenman, M.D. behalf by: Hope, Women’s Health
Forum Moderator
I would recommend spinal or epidural anesthesia, there are fewer
problems with vital signs and you awaken from mild to moderate sedation
pain free before the numbness wears off. It is an excellent choice for
low pelvic surgery. There is no anesthetic agent throughout your entire
body so when it wears off it is over, less nausea and less respiratory
problems.
--
Amy Rosenman, M.D.
Assistant Clinical Professor GYN
UCLA - Santa Monica, California
Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes
only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient
relationship. This information is not intended to supplant
the need for you to consult with your physician prior to
choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions.
** Private emails cannot be entertained due to time
constraints; consequently, they will receive no response.
At Sat, 18 Aug 2007, caitcon wrote:
>
>Hi,
>I had cystocele/TOT sling and tubaligation in May 2007. I was given
>General Anesthesia. I am scheduled for rectocele repair in two weeks.
>I have two anesthesia opions for my repair this time, either General or
>Spinal.
>During my last surgery I was experiencing difficulties in the recovery
>room.
>For a period of about 45 minutes (starting about 35 minutes after
>surgery) they had trouble keeping my vitals stable. For at least 30
>minutes my bloodpressure was around 60/30 and my oxygen saturation
>between 76-82%. After about 45 minutes they were able to keep my oxygen
>above 90 and my bloodpressure slowly started to increase. I remember
>that the nurse told me at one point that some people keep the anesthesia
>medicine in their fatty tissue longer than other and then release it all
>at once, and that is why I was not doing so well for a while.
>Now my question, given that this happened in the recovery room, would my
>risks of this happening again be smaller by using spinal anesthesia?
>I am leaning towards general again, but would consider a spinal if less
>problems occur. Any input would be appreciated....