Re: Calcification in uterus/Repost
From: Alicia Lapidus M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:45:57 -0500 (CDT)
Yes, perhaps and endometrial biopsy is needed.
At Thu, 24 Jul 2003, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote:
>
>Is the below measurements normal?
>
>>Calcification Area-Endometrium. Uterus 7.4. No Fibroma. Thickness of
>>uterus-1.3 Right Ovary 3.5 x 2.6 x 2.8 Left Ovary 2.8 x 1.8 x 2.2.
>>
>>At Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Hector Nemirovsky M.D. wrote:
>>>
>>>Site of the calcification area:endometrium or myometrium,size of the
>>>uterus,if there is any fibroma,how are the ovaries etc.
>>>
>>>>>More info is needed.
>>>>>
>>>>>At Tue, 15 Jul 2003, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>had to have an ultrasound because of bleeding too often, 2 years ago I
>>>>>>had small area of calcification, now they say there is a significant
>>>>>>change and the growth has quadrupled. They say this is not normal, and
>>>>>>that they have never seen it before, they said it also goes down into my
>>>>>>cervix. They wouldnt explain much and it is two months before I see a
>>>>>>specialist, could you please give me some insight, should I be worried
>>>>>>that the calcification has grown that much, I should mention that in the
>>>>>>past two years no surgeries or anything that would cause more scar
>>>>>>tissue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thank you,
--
Alicia Lapidus MD
Director Obgyn.net Latina
Chief of Staff Obstetrics, Hospital J. A. Fernández
Buenos Aires
Argentina
Note: opinions expressed here are for educational purposes
only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient
relationship. This information is not intended to supplant
the need for you to consult with your physician prior to
choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions.
**Private emails cannot be entertained due to time
constraints; consequently, they will receive no response.
![[ Women's Health Forum ]](http://www.obgyn.net/images_women/wh-forum.gif)