WOMENS-HEALTH Messages for March, 2003: Re: Hypoechoic Fibroid of 36.5 mm predominantly subserous in location and bulging over the right postero-lateral wall of supra-cerviacal region.

Re: Hypoechoic Fibroid of 36.5 mm predominantly subserous in location and bulging over the right postero-lateral wall of supra-cerviacal region.

From: Shelly (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 05:49:44 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: sameasalways: "Re: Anyone ever use a diaphragm (yes)"
Previous message: terri: "umbilical endometriosis"
In reply to: Hector Nemirovsky M.D.: "Re: Hypoechoic Fibroid of 36.5 mm predominantly subserous in location and bulging over the right postero-lateral wall of supra-cerviacal region."

Posted on 13-3-2003 Thank you doctor for your response Here are my Hormonal evaluation: T4(micg/dl):6.72; TSH(microIU/ml): 3.3;Prolactin(ng/ml) 10.11Testosterone(ng/ml):0.74; LH(mIU/ml): 6.84 I have not done any endometrial biopsy Reards: Shelly Sen Sharma At Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Hector Nemirovsky M.D. wrote: >
>Appears to be hormonal, no other hormones evaluation?, or endometrial
>biopsy?Difficult to answer without more details.
>
>At Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Shelly wrote:
>>
>>I am a thirty year old woman suffering from excessive bleeding for the
>>last 5-6 years. My cycles are abnormal. My bleeding can be anything
>>between 5 to 2 months and when it goes on for 2 onths it is stoopped
>>only after giving medicines like perlutal -N or regesstone. I have been
>>on either Perlutal N or Regestrone for the last 4-5 years and after
>>administering the medicines the cycles become normal for 2-3 months then
>>again the promlems reapperas.I am a single woman. My USG report shows
>>77.0x50.6x34.1mms. it is normal in size shape and outline. there is a
>>fibroid of 36.5 mm largest dimension and predominantly subserous in
>>location and bulging over the right postero lateral wall of tghe supra
>>cervical region. Central Endometrial echo is 5.3mm in thickness.
>>Uterine cavity is empty. Cervix is normal. Right ovary
>>-48.3x22.9x18.9mms : Left Ovary 43.2x22.8x17.8mms both the ovaries are
>>mildly enlarged in size but normal in shape outline and echotexture. No
>>dominant follicle is sen in either ovary.
>>My question is what are the treatment options available for my
>>condition. Is hormone the only medicines? What are the longterm effects
>>of such a disease? Would it cause any problem if I want to conceive in
>>Future.
>>Kindly reply
>>regards Shelly Sen Sharma
>
>--
>Hector Nemirovsky M.D.
>Fmr Head Obstetrics Division, Hospital Fernández, Buenos Aires, Argentina
>Fmr Assistant Professor in Obstetrics at Medical School, Buenos Aires University, Argentina
>Private Practice,
>Buenos Aires,
>Argentina
>
>Note: opinions expressed here are for educational purposes
> only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient
> relationship. This information is not intended to supplant
> the need for you to consult with your physician prior to
> choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions.
>
> **Private emails cannot be entertained due to time
> constraints; consequently, they will receive no response.
>

Next message: sameasalways: "Re: Anyone ever use a diaphragm (yes)"
Previous message: terri: "umbilical endometriosis"
In reply to: Hector Nemirovsky M.D.: "Re: Hypoechoic Fibroid of 36.5 mm predominantly subserous in location and bulging over the right postero-lateral wall of supra-cerviacal region."

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote

use when must restrict search to only the women's health forum...
Enter search keywords:
	Returns per screen: Require all keywords: