|
Re: pc bleeding and endo ca. HI ANON, BEAV AGAIN, I DIDN'T MEAN
From: beav (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 20:48:58 -0600 (CST)
At Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Anon wrote:
I apologize if I gave that impression. I didn't think you were saying
it meanly. My aunt also had uterine ca. thus my concern. And my dad,
unknown primary ca. as well as his sister. That's why I'm going for
2nd opinion, my current doc (who I've been with a long time) seems to be
taking it with a grain of salt because it's been an issue for so long.
Some of the docs say fibroids don't cause pc bleeding, others say it
does, that's why I'm always interested in getting a new docs opinion.
But I guess they can. Did you ever have a biopsy in the office not by
D&C and does it hurt? Is that what you meant by stinging?
Good luck to you and thanks. Hope all is cleared up now.
>
>Hey Beav,
>
>I truly don't want to start anything here....I mean that.....so please
>forgive me if it seems so. I do know Fran Dresher's story........and
>more importantly, I was in the same place as you.......I had irregular
>bleeding and fibroids. My mother had uterine cancer and had had a
>hysterectomy and radiation after......so I understand your concern. I
>ended up having a hysterectomy for all of the problems my fibroids were
>causing me. I have been there--both with fibroids, irregular bleeding
>and uterine cancer in my immediate family.
>
>That being said, it seems like this is causeing you a lot of anxiety and
>at some point you either have to accept the opinions of these docs here
>and your own doc.....and let the worry go with appropriate follow up or
>this going to drive you nuts. Maybe you and the new doc can agree on an
>amount of testing/biopsies that will put you at ease. I don't know how
>many biopsies etc docs can do safely (they sure do sting!). I just hope
>that you can find a way to deal with the anxiety because right now you
>seem really focused on something that is though possible, remote.
>
>Good Luck. Sorry this was so long.
>
>At Tue, 4 Mar 2003, beav wrote:
>>
>>At Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Anon wrote:
>>
|
|