Re: ULTRASOUND RESULTS
From: Alicia M. Lapidus M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Fri, 27 Dec 2002 07:52:43 -0600 (CST)
U/S shows ovarian pathology that have to be removed and analized ASAP.
At Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Mitzi wrote:
>
>I RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING CONDENSED REPORT ON AN ULTRASOUND PERFORMED 11/02:
>
>THE UTERINE ECHOTEXTURE IS HOMOGENEOUS WITH NO FOCAL MASSES. RT OVARY ENLARGED AND MEASURES 11.8 X 7.6 X 9.2 CM TRANSVERSELY. THE RT OVAR IS MARKEDLY HYPOECHOIC AND CYSTIC ON APPEARANCE WITH INTERNAL NEOPLASM. THE LEFT OVARY IS ALSO SIGNIFICANTLY ENLARGED AT 6.3 X 6 X 6.2 CM TRANSVERSELY. HOWEVER, THE LEFT OVARY HAS ECHOTEXTURE MORE CONSISTENT WITH A SOLID TUMOR, ALTHOUGH THERE ARE SEVERAL HYPO TO ANECHOIC AREAS WITHIN THE LEFT OVARY. NO FREE FLUID IS IDENTIFIED WITH THE PELVIS.
>
>IMPRESSION: ENLARGED AND CYSTIC OVARIAN NEOPLASM; LEFT OVARY WITH MORE SOLID APPEARANCE -- OVARIAN NEOPLASM VERSUS DERMOID?
>
>I AM 40 Y/O B/F, 3 C-SECTIONS, LAST BEING 14 YRS AGO. TUBAL DONE 14 YRS AGO. PLEASE HELP ME TO INTERPRET THIS ULTRASOUND. I AM SCHEDULED FOR SURGERY ON 01/17/03. I PRESENTED TO THE DOCTOR BECAUSE I WAS HAVING SEVERE PAIN TO THE LEFT LOWER ABD BEFORE AND DOING MY CYCLES. I HAVE DEALT WITH THIS FOR MANY YEARS. PAP SMEARS COME BACK NEGATIVE. THIS TIME AN ULTRASOUND WAS PERFORMED. MANUAL PALPATION REVEALED NO MASSES, BUT WERE VERY PAINFUL. I AM GETTING A LITTLE NERVOUS.
>
>ALSO, WHAT IS THE NORMAL SIZE OF THE OVARY, AND WHAT ACCOUNTS FOR IT BEING THIS LARGE? THANKS IN ADVANCED.
--
Alicia M. Lapidus M.D.
Director Obgyn.net Latina
Chief of Staff Obstetrics, Hospital J. A. Fernández
Buenos Aires
Argentina
Note: opinions expressed here are for educational purposes
only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient
relationship. This information is not intended to supplant
the need for you to consult with your physician prior to
choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions.
**Private emails cannot be entertained due to time
constraints; consequently, they will receive no response.