![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: unicornate uterus and VBACFrom: samir fouad Aziz MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Mon, 23 Dec 2002 17:11:09 -0600 (CST)
At Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Heidi wrote: > >I delievered my daughter three years ago with c-section due to breech position at 38 weeks (planned c-section). I am now 34 weeks pregnant and this baby is head down. My OB strongly recommends another c-section. I would like to attempt VBAC, but only if the risk is not higher than studies show. I am concerned about the size of my unicornate uterus being smaller than normal and the skin around the scar thin. My daughter weighed 6 pounds, not a big baby. I don't know about the weight of this baby. > >Are there any statistics on this or recommendations? Any advice is welcome. > >Thanks you have two problems, unicornate uterus and previous C-section,conduction of normal labour with unicornate uterus is susptible to abnormal uterine action with unpredicatble progress during the first stage with a high possibility of emergency c-section.
-- SAmir Fouad Aziz MD Assist Professor OB.Gyn Director Gyn.oncology Al-Azhar University-Egypt Editorial advisor OBgyn.net(P&B,Gyn.Oncology) Consultant Editor the contemporary Who's Who This is for teaching purposes only
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 06:49:08 2009
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote
home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international