![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Lupron confusionFrom: Gail (anonymous@obgyn.net)Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:19:27 -0600 (CST)
At Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Deborah wrote: > >I was just prescribed Lupron by my GYN and am confused because I do not >have ovaries and therefore I do not produce the estrogen that Lupron is >supposed to stop. I am 47 years old. > I (42) am in a similar situation, had a TAH and BSO 7 years ago, but about a year ago my pain got worse and some spotting/bleeding came back. I have a mass where my right ovary used to be, and some cyclical spotting or bleeding, so my doctors think I may have residual ovarian tissue, although the blood tests for FSH and estradiol were not as conclusive as hoped. I initially refused Lupron because, like you, I did not see how it could work in me, but now have given in, even though we don't know for sure whether I have any ovarian tissue left. I had my first Lupron shot last week, and things are currently pretty bad with respect to pain and bleeding, but I hope that is the effect of the Lupron, and that it is actually starting to work, since it initially aggravates the symptoms. I am scheduled for some more testing to exclude some other conditions in December, and my doctor thought I did not have anything to loose to try Lupron in the meantime. I had pretty severe menopausal symptoms in any case for the last year after stopping Premarin (and yet my symptoms got worse!), and I decided the risks associated with Lupron are relatively minor compared to major surgery. If it helps to delay surgery for a while, I'll be happy, but no one really has any idea how much of a chance I have that this will actually work. Maybe your doctor thinks you have some ovarian tissue that was left behind also? It is not uncommon with severe endometriosis.
-- Gail
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 06:23:50 2008