![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: which is better trans vaginal or abdominal?From: Helen (anonymous@obgyn.net)Fri, 6 Sep 2002 07:03:33 -0500 (CDT)
At Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Nadine wrote: > >Embarking on the road to reconstructive surgery. Have cystocele, >rectocele, some stress in continence, two torn labia, muscle damage due >to Stage 3 tear all thanks to 10 pd baby. She's magnificent. The >aftermath isn't. Have met with Dr. Raz at UCLA and Dr. Leach at >Cedars. Dr. Raz suggests surgery using synthetic mesh to repair >everything. Mesh for a sling too. He would make small incision above >pubic bone. Dr. Leach uses sling made of cadaver tissue and does it >all vaginally. So what's better? I can't seem to find anything out >there to compare the two. What are pro and cons of the different >surgeries? Both doctors seem very capable. The one thing I know is that >the cadaver tissue operation Dr. LEach does is not necessarily proven >long term. It hasn't been around long enough. (four years?) What is >your experience? ANything else I should be thinking of? If anyone can >point me in some direction I'd appreciate it. Thanks Nadine Check out http://www.communities.com.au/Choiceforprolapse - these ladies have been through all this and will be able to help.
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 06:21:15 2008