search:

LAVH / prolapse

From: barbara (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 20:37:52 -0500 (CDT)


My family practice MD has recommended a LAVH (total) for prolapsing "everything"...however I am concerned about loosing the ovaries. My hormonal levels are currently wnl even though I have only had five periods the past year. I am 51. I had been on Mircette for a couple of years prior to stopping one year ago and physically and emotionally feel much better. The rationale for taking everything was that I probably only have two more years at best of use from my ovaries and if I keep them then I will always have to be concerned about ovarian cancer in the future (no family hx ever). Even though I may have only two yrs of hormonal production before my ovaries die, the contoversy remains regarding HRT/breast ca etal. Is two more years of natural production, albeit probably inconsistent, better than synthetic. Am I missing something here? Thank you for your thoughts and comments. Barbara





recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the women's health forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:
Return to [ Women's Health Forum ] Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 05:58:45 2008

home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international
e-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer |

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved.
Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com