 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The first uterus transplant in humans!From: Alex (anonymous@obgyn.net)Thu, 7 Mar 2002 13:16:03 -0600 (CST)
At Thu, 7 Mar 2002, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote: > >I have NEVER heard of any insurance company that would pay for IVF. As >well they should not. It is too expensive and not medically necessary. >The whole scenario is highly unlikely to ever take place. Read ABC news >article as well as the one that was just posted from the Canadian paper. >Wealth means nothing if it is impossible to achieve. Getting a uterus >to last two months is a far cry from getting it to withstand a >pregnancy. I hope no one is holding their breath for this to happen. In Massachusetts ,insurers MUST pay for IVF. Infertility as been considered by many to be a low medical priority, yet advances continue, and will continue, in the field. All sides to an issue are reported in the media- doing so doesn't mean it won't happen. Read the New York Times article.
|
|
Return to ![[ Women's Health Forum ]](http://www.obgyn.net/images_women/wh-forum.gif)
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 06:13:42 2008