search:

Re: The first uterus transplant in humans!

From: Alex (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Thu, 7 Mar 2002 13:16:03 -0600 (CST)


At Thu, 7 Mar 2002, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote: >
>I have NEVER heard of any insurance company that would pay for IVF. As
>well they should not. It is too expensive and not medically necessary.
>The whole scenario is highly unlikely to ever take place. Read ABC news
>article as well as the one that was just posted from the Canadian paper.
>Wealth means nothing if it is impossible to achieve. Getting a uterus
>to last two months is a far cry from getting it to withstand a
>pregnancy. I hope no one is holding their breath for this to happen.

In Massachusetts ,insurers MUST pay for IVF.

Infertility as been considered by many to be a low medical priority, yet advances continue, and will continue, in the field. All sides to an issue are reported in the media- doing so doesn't mean it won't happen. Read the New York Times article.




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the women's health forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:
Return to [ Women's Health Forum ] Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 06:33:59 2009

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote

home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international
e-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer |

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved.
Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com