WOMENS-HEALTH Messages for January, 2002: Re: CIN II-III

Re: CIN II-III

From: anonymous@obgyn.net
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 05:14:53 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: R. Daniel Braun, MD: "Re: Fibroid, Lupron, and Endometriosis"
Previous message: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: 49 + early periods??"
In reply to: anonymous@obgyn.net: "CIN II-III"
Next in thread: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: CIN II-III"

I had a couple of unsuccessful surgeries like you for CIN II and then tried a treatment you can read about at http://www.alotek.com I am now improved at CIN I. For some women surgery does not work and I would advise that you read up on this on Medline. Vaccines are being developed and also interferon-based immune boosting treatments. Surgery is risky itself, so is getting in a car and driving to the store. You just have to do the research yourself and at least get a couple more opinions before you make a decision.

At Wed, 2 Jan 2002, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote: >
>I'm a healthy 51 y/o, P3 G7, no family hx cancer.
>After two CIN II-III paps (confirmed by colo and biopsy) and two LEEPs, my
>gyn has nothing to offer except hysterectomy if I have another abnormal pap.
>I find it rather ridiculous to have major surgery to remove an organ that,
>while showing abnormalities, is not diseased. What are the odds of 1)missing
>a lesion that is inaccessible to pap/LEEP 2)actually developing cancer at
>some point (where are statistics and sources)? - how much risk on the
>gamble!?
>Any other suggestions than prophylactic hysterectomy? THANKS!!!

Next message: R. Daniel Braun, MD: "Re: Fibroid, Lupron, and Endometriosis"
Previous message: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: 49 + early periods??"
In reply to: anonymous@obgyn.net: "CIN II-III"
Next in thread: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: CIN II-III"

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote

use when must restrict search to only the women's health forum...
Enter search keywords:
	Returns per screen: Require all keywords: