![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: ? on depth of endometrium post EAFrom: Lynn D. Montgomery, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:49:59 -0600 (CST)
At Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Michelle wrote: > >I had an abdominal U/S and a transvag. U/S done yesterday...and the U/S >tech told me all looked good. Now I realize the it has not been read by >a doc yet...but I will get the results soon which I am taking with me to >a new ob/gyn. > >She said the normal lining is 12 ml, and mine was 5 ml...I am so happy >as I think this is GOOD news. :) I just wanted to ask you how accurate >her number is as far as the normal depth of the lining and is 5 ml's >almost two years post-EA good? Does this mean that only a little less >than half of my uterine lining was destroyed by the ablation? My periods >are very light...so, when I heard 5 ml, at first I was very happy - >until I realized that is just a little under half. > >I had the U/S's performed to just 'take a look around' as there was a >suspicious mass seen in the lower segment of my uterus, or in my cervix >at my last U/S...but it was chalked up to a 'shadow', but we wanted to >make sure it was just a shadow and not a mass...she said there was no >mass that she saw. :) I did have water around my uterus too...but she >said all that means is that I probably had a cyst that burst. > >Thank You :) That is mm not ml and 5 mm is just fine post ablation. The reality is that the measurement does not mean that much, it is your clinical result that counts... Lynn
-- Lynn D. Montgomery, MD Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center Missoula, Montana
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 06:09:42 2008