![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: tuble reconstructionFrom: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sun, 31 Dec 2000 14:22:24 -0600 (CST)
At Sun, 31 Dec 2000, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote: > >--part1_de.e473ec4.2780b97f_boundary >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >I had my tubes reconstructed after having them burned about about 4 years >ago. What are my chances of getting pregnant? I conceived my 1st son at >the blink of an eye and pathetically had the same expectation after the >surgery, I must confess the surgery was performed on Oct. 31,2000, (I >know) I need to relax but, is this possibility real and how real is it? >Thanks Mary Kay > >--part1_de.e473ec4.2780b97f_boundary >Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >I had my tubes reconstructed after having them burned about about 4 years ago. What are my chances of getting pregnant? I conceived my 1st son at the blink of an eye and pathetically had the same expectation after the surgery, I must confess the surgery was performed on Oct. 31,2000, (I know) I need to relax but, is this possibility real and how real is it? Thanks Mary Kay > >--part1_de.e473ec4.2780b97f_boundary-- MK The quoted #'s are between 0 and 80%. It really depends on where the tubes were burned and how much of a discrepancy there is in the tubal lumen before the reansatamosis. This is why some RE guys just go straight to invitro after a TL as the success rate is about 40%. Hope this helps.
-- William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG Editorial Advisor-Pregnancy and Birth Private Practice New Orleans, La.
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 05:39:17 2008