![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: problem pregnancyFrom: Kelly Shanahan, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Fri, 30 Jun 2000 22:42:55 -0500 (CDT)
At Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Denise wrote: > >I am about 7weeks pregnant. I became pregnant while using an IUD. I >went to the doctor and she confirmed that I was pregnant. She sent me >to have a sonogram at that time i was about 4 weeks. The sonogram >showed no evidence of a gestational sac. I then went back several times >and had blood drawn for the HCG level it started at 4941 it then went to >7331 then to 33,745 and now 7 days later it is at 96,000. Before the >last blood work she sent me for another sonogram and the technician said >she seen the fetal pole however it was close to the lining and she could >not measure. she also told me that until they got a destictive picture >the radiologist would not claim it. the report went back to my doctor >and she said in the report there was no evidence of a fetal pole repeat >blood work and she did. Now i am sitting here incredilbe frustrated >because i have been going through this for the last 4 weeks. Do you >think i should be worried about my baby? With a hCG level of 96,000 a fetal pole and a heartbeat should have been seen. I would be concerned about a blighted ovum (a preganncy that started but never developed properly)
Would you have followed the
>same procedures as these doctor? Was it proper for the tecnician to tell I suggest you call your doc and ask what the heck is going on. I would do a repeat ultrasound, using a vaginal probe and base further recommendations on that
-- M. Kelly Shanahan, MD, FACOG S. LAke Tahoe, CA
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 06:09:49 2009
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote
home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international