![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: chlamydia questionFrom: Kari (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sat, 29 Apr 2000 17:21:46 -0500 (CDT)
At Sat, 29 Apr 2000, William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG wrote: > >At Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Kari wrote: >> >>When I got pregnant with my 2nd child I had all the normal test done, >>one that came back positive was for chlamydia. I was shocked. My dr's >>nurse was also shocked by the test and even inquired at the lab as to >>their false positive rate. The nurse felt it was a mixup but my dr. did >>not want to retest right away, he wanted to get me on antibiotics and >>then retest later after I had finished antibiotics. >>I knew I hadn't been with anyone beside my husband for 8 yrs and I had >>no reason to feel my husband had been unfaithful. But, I began to >>question his faithfulness since the only way to get it is thru sexual >>contact. I felt rather stupid when he tested negative. Now my question >>is, if it was possible to have contracted chlamydia before I met my >>husband wouldn't it have shown up on a previous test, even if it was >>dormant? If it doesn't show up on tests while dormant shouldn't my >>husband been given antibiotics too, just in case? If I did have it all >>these years, wouldn't it have wreaked havoc on my reproductive organs by >>now? > >Kari >Great questions. The most possible explanation is that this was a false >positive test, esp if it was not a formal culture, but a dna probe. >To answer the second part of the question, it is possible to have >obtained it in the distant past and not have had terrible damage to your >pelvic organs. >I do not have a definitive answer to your problem, but perhaps ask your >MD to perform a formal chlamydia culture on you. Good Luck > >I am not sure what kind of test it was, but I do know that I thought it was the "culture" because he had to go inside to get it, my husband only needed to pee in a cup. >-- >William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG >Editorial Advisor-Pregnancy and Birth >Private Practice >New Orleans, La. > >*Please understand I can not respond to private emails. > >*These comments are for educational purposes only. They are >not meant to take the place of an examination by a qualified >health care provider. They are not intended to be the start >of a physician-patient relationship. >
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 05:33:28 2008