![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: chlamydia questionFrom: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sat, 29 Apr 2000 13:44:44 -0500 (CDT)
At Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Kari wrote: > >When I got pregnant with my 2nd child I had all the normal test done, >one that came back positive was for chlamydia. I was shocked. My dr's >nurse was also shocked by the test and even inquired at the lab as to >their false positive rate. The nurse felt it was a mixup but my dr. did >not want to retest right away, he wanted to get me on antibiotics and >then retest later after I had finished antibiotics. >I knew I hadn't been with anyone beside my husband for 8 yrs and I had >no reason to feel my husband had been unfaithful. But, I began to >question his faithfulness since the only way to get it is thru sexual >contact. I felt rather stupid when he tested negative. Now my question >is, if it was possible to have contracted chlamydia before I met my >husband wouldn't it have shown up on a previous test, even if it was >dormant? If it doesn't show up on tests while dormant shouldn't my >husband been given antibiotics too, just in case? If I did have it all >these years, wouldn't it have wreaked havoc on my reproductive organs by >now? Kari Great questions. The most possible explanation is that this was a false positive test, esp if it was not a formal culture, but a dna probe. To answer the second part of the question, it is possible to have obtained it in the distant past and not have had terrible damage to your pelvic organs. I do not have a definitive answer to your problem, but perhaps ask your MD to perform a formal chlamydia culture on you. Good Luck
-- William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG Editorial Advisor-Pregnancy and Birth Private Practice New Orleans, La.
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 05:33:28 2008