![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: AdhesionsFrom: anonymous@obgyn.netTue, 25 Apr 2000 09:19:34 -0500 (CDT)
At Mon, 24 Apr 2000, Helen wrote: > >I have adhesions from a direct result of a Total Abdominal Hysterectomy >which I had 12/6/99. My adhesions are attached to my bowel, intestines >and diaphram. My question is my ob/gyn told me I could not have a >vaginal hysterectomy because my uterus had not dropped, and therefore, >would have to have an abdominal hysterectomy, which I definitely did not >want because I had been cut there three previous times for endometriosis >and two c-sections. Is all this suffering I am going thru, only because >she lacked experience in doing vaginal hysterectomies? If a person has a >history of endometriosis and/or 3 prior laparotomies, should laparotic >surgery be performed without advising a patient of their risk of >adhesions? > >-- >Helen Chalmers > I consider myself to be a better than average vaginal surgeon, and I perform the great majority (>70%) of my hysterectomies vaginally, either alone or with laproscopic assistance if needed. I believe very strongly that the vaginal route is to be preferred. However, even I would not have considered attempting a vaginal hysterectomy on someone with your described surgical history. It would be absurdly risky, even if it could have been accomplished at all. I strongly doubt that your adhesions are just from the hyst for that matter. Endometriosis and C/S are 2 of the 3 biggest causes of pelvic and abdominal adhesions with pelvic infections being the third. It sounds to me as if your doctor chose the prudent and appropriate approach.
-- William D. McIntosh, MD, FACOG Clarksville, TN
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:49:52 2008