![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: surgery is scheduled......hope I am doing the right thing (Dr. Hill) Or whoever would like to commentFrom: Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sun, 16 Apr 2000 14:19:58 -0500 (CDT)
At Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Peggy wrote: > >At Fri, 14 Apr 2000, D. Ashley Hill, MD wrote: > >>I have questioned through out > >>....he is going to >>>try to "burn" the pelvic walls to see if he can get rid of the ORS. > >one would not "burn" the pelvic walls to remove ORS. >>Rather, one might "fulgurate" or cauterize areas of endometriosis. >>Sounds like a miscommunication. > >I have been having CPP in The LLQ for over 2 years.I have had 4 >surgeries 1.LAVH and LSO 2. Laporoscopy for lysis of severe adhesions >3. Laporoscopy for severe adhesions (intercede applied) 4. Laporsoscopy >(no adhesions were found at this time) diagnosed with endometriosis and >had RSO he did not remove the endo.due to it being to close to involving >the bowel and so he was withholding HRT for 3 months to allow the endo. >to "DIE" off ,pain still persists,had FSH and Estadiol levels checked, >both are elevated.Dr. feels that there may be ovarian fragments that >are producing estrogen.Started Lupron 2 weeks ago and have had an >increase in pain.So my Dr. is more certain now that it could be ORS . >> >>He >>>said that he can't tell what is ORS, endo, or adhesions.....does that >>>sound right? >> >>Sure does. Until he goes in and looks there is no diagnostic test that >>will give the answer. Could be all three (let's hope not). > >What is the difference in appearence between endo and ORS ? Endo looks like endo (sorry) and ORS may or may not be visible whichis why some recommend Clomid to stimulate the tissue.
>> Haven't recommended it personally but RT has been used for various disease entities and the ovaries have been "knocked out". The theory is sound, the practical application is another item. A consult with a radiation therapist may be helpful.
>Seems a little radical to me. Why not go in and try to excise the endo If possible (multiple surgeries and possible adhesions leading to increased surgical risks), it does, theoretically, sound better. HSM
>Thanks for any responce! Peggy
-- Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. FACOG, FACS Great Neck, New York
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 06:08:04 2009
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote
home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international