-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: (no subject) From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Wed Sep 22 10:45:34 1999 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Ori Shen MD: "Reccomendation for a book" Previous message: DuboseTerryJ@exchange.uams.edu: "Re: (no subject)" In reply to: DuboseTerryJ@exchange.uams.edu: "Re: (no subject)" Terry - when NY Gov. Al Smith ran against Herbert Hoover, he was asked to comment on Hoover's "chicken in every pot" program. Smith responded, "No matter how you slice it, it still comes out baloney." Art At Wed, 22 Sep 1999, DuboseTerryJ@exchange.uams.edu wrote: > >My question has to do with what and how you are testing, not your >advertisement wording (which is biased).... you claim a 95% accuracy for the >determination of the embryonic/fetal gender after 6 weeks from maternal >urine. Where is this research published? What are you testing? > >This sounds like fraud, pure and simple. > >Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS >Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program >CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences >Little Rock, Arkansas, USA >501-686-6510 >http://www.io.com/~dubose/ <http://www.io.com/~dubose/> >http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm <http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm> > >http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm ><http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm> > > -----Original Message----- > From: urobiologics [SMTP:urobiologics@bignet.net] > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 11:25 PM > To: DuboseTerryJ@exchange.uams.edu; urogender@urobiologics.com > Subject: (no subject) > > Dear Sir / Madam, > > We do not have much to say than what we said earlier. Which > advertisements are being referred to. We will try to improve if >anything > is objectionable. We are always open to suggestions because this >site is > still new and under development. We have duly incorporated >improvements > suggested by geneticists and ultrasonographers. There is no >intention to > raise any conflict here. > > We must mention that this is a test performed on voluntarily >submitted > urine samples and is purely for non medical purposes and only to > determine gender of the fetus. > > Sincerely, > urobiologics.com -- "Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." -----Dennis Miller art fougner, md SonoScan/Genetic Sciences forest hills, ny evsono@pipeline.com Next message: Ori Shen MD: "Reccomendation for a book" Previous message: DuboseTerryJ@exchange.uams.edu: "Re: (no subject)" In reply to: DuboseTerryJ@exchange.uams.edu: "Re: (no subject)"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:40:18 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.