![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: new trends and approaches in biophysical profileFrom: DuboseTerryJ@exchange.uams.eduTue Sep 7 11:07:32 1999
It does seem that polyhydramnios would be included in the BPP in some way. Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS Director, Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program CHRP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock, Arkansas, USA 501-686-6510 http://www.io.com/~dubose/ <http://www.io.com/~dubose/> http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm <http://www.uams.edu/CHRP/dmshome.htm> http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm <http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm> -----Original Message----- From: evsono@pipeline.com [SMTP:evsono@pipeline.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 10:57 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: new trends and approaches in biophysical profile Terry just got back from vacation. everyone knows that anomalies should be excluded with poly. the prob i am concerned with is the increased perinatal mortality and morbidity associated with poly, even in the absence of anomalies. yet all the "scoring systems" ignore this prob, focusing on oligo. perhaps Dr Platt has a comment concerning poly. Art
At Thu, 26 Aug 1999, DuboseTerryJ@exchange.uams.edu wrote:
>
profile
>
divided. In july two articles suggested oligo might be less important yet
another showed a significant import with borderline amt of af. also - as
you suggest, the definition of oligo seems to vary from study to study.
where is your reference on your work with cerebro - umbilical differences.
Could not find this. and what about the significance of poly? should not
the interpretation of bpp take the negative impact of poly into account? I
have not found fetal breathing all that useful, especially in diabetics
whose glucose seems to stimulate breathing. look forward to hearing from
you.
>
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:40:18 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.