|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Supine vs Standing CervixFrom: James Smeltzer (Smeltzer_James@promina.org)Thu May 27 09:20:47 1999
To All, As this discussion came up before, I thought I would share this abstract, published by an old friend: TITLE: Maternal position and ultrasonic cervical assessment in multiple pregnancy. Preliminary observations. AUTHORS: Arabin B; Aardenburg R; van Eyck J AUTHOR AFFILIATION: Department of Perinatology, Sophia Ziekenhuis, Zwolle, The Netherlands. SOURCE: J Reprod Med 1997 Nov;42(11):719-24 CITATION IDS: PMID: 9408871 UI: 98073188 ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of position on the functional anatomy of the cervix. STUDY DESIGN: Cervical length and width of the internal os were measured by transvaginal ultrasound in the recumbent and standing position from 15 gestational weeks to term in 15 twin and 3 triplet pregnancies. Measurements on asymptomatic primigravidae with twins who delivered vaginally after 36 weeks were made to calculate trends in normal twin pregnancies. These data were compared with that obtained in patients who had threatened preterm labor. RESULTS: As the total observation period progressed, the mean cervical length decreased from 50 to 27 mm in the recumbent position and from 48 to 21 mm in the standing position (P < .001). The differences between the values obtained in the recumbent and standing position increased from 5% to 31% as pregnancy progressed (P < .001). Funnelling was observed from 20 weeks onwards in the erect position but only after 35 weeks in the recumbent position. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary observations support a policy aimed at prevention of prematurity by reducing physical activity and standing work in patients who have multiple gestations. The full impact of these observations on the early detection of special risk groups and the prescription of preventive interventions have yet to be evaluated. Jim S
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:40:00 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.