ULTRASOUND Messages for May, 1999: Lawson: Ignore the cornual pregnancy?

Lawson: Ignore the cornual pregnancy?
From: MARK LAWSON (lawson98@juno.com)
Wed May 19 14:04:27 1999

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: MARK LAWSON: "Lawson: WNL Sono not= WNL Baby"
Previous message: DuBose, Terry: "Re: sono image - sample 19th May"

Thanks for the input Ted, and my limited experience is that all the cornual pregnacies we've seen have done okay... they still scare the little wit I have out of me.... Heading to the books.... reminds me of learning that the pancreas was part retroperitoneal..... but I never found out what the other part was :-)

-- Mark Lawson Texas
On Fri, 14 May 1999 22:27:03 -0500 "E.A. Lyons" <lyons@cc.UManitoba.CA> writes: >A cornual pregnancy is not an ectopic.. an interstitial pregnancy is >an >ectopic. The cornual implantation will have endometrium around it, the >interstitial one will not. Interstitial ectopics cannot be ignored. >Ted

or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Next message: MARK LAWSON: "Lawson: WNL Sono not= WNL Baby"
Previous message: DuBose, Terry: "Re: sono image - sample 19th May"

Return to Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:39:59 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
	Returns per screen: Require all keywords: