|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Uterine synechial porthole update.From: Martin Necas and Tania Keep (exiled@clear.net.nz)Sat Jan 9 22:13:48 1999
Dear Allen, I will be looking forward to reading and seeing what you find next time. This certainly is a unique case with brilliant image quality. Many Regards, Martin. -----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Joseph A Worrall Sent: Sunday, January 10, 1999 2:54 PM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: Re: Uterine synechial porthole update. Martin - the drawing came through just fine, and prints fine also. This system just will not handle an attachment - the same thing happens when I try to send a MS Word 97 .doc as an attachment. Thanks for that drawing, and that will help me when I am scanning her next. In fact, I was thinking of constructing some kind of model, but as I noted before, I need to keep an open mind, and not approach the scan with my mind already made up. Allen
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:39:37 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.