|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Uterine synechia or amniotic band?From: arthur thompson (arthurt@prodigy.net)Fri Aug 28 16:45:36 1998
At Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Kim Williams wrote: > >At 14 weeks, I was diagnosed with having a possible amniotic band. The >band, at that point, was not near or interfering with the baby. Next week, >I will have a follow-up ultrasound at 18 weeks. I have been quite >concerned about this, not knowing what to expect. I have read that 70% of >these bands disappear. Is this statistic accurate? Any information you >could provide would be most helpful and appreciated. > >-- >Kim Williams >kwilliams@fcs.k12.al.us >
-- I WAS ALSO DIAG W/ POSS AMNIOTIC BAND,OR A TWIN SACK W/OUT BABY.IF YOU GET ANY INFO PLEASE FOREWARD TO US. LORIE
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:39:06 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.