Re: contrast agents

From: Terry J. DuBose (tjdubose@juno.com)
Mon Aug 10 23:04:35 1998


This is important. Contrast agents will probably provide the sonographic signature for malignancies. If we can provide the definitive analysis for breast/ovarian/endometrial CA... we win the whole set of dishes.

Peace, Terry J. DuBose

--
Hi Joan,  Just to clarify my "3-5 years".  I should have been more
specific.  It   will be that long before contrast agents are used
ROUTINELY by the   "average" lab for perfusion.  The holy grail of
perfusion has not been   achieved yet by these agents even in the hands
of the researchers.  One researcher at University of Virginia, Dr. Sanjiv
Kaul, puts it   this way when it comes to contrast agents in
echocardiography:

*The Pharmaceutical companies are 80% of the way there with the development of bubbles (contrast agents) *The Ultrasound companies are 40% of the way there with the development of systems and transducers to interact with bubbles *End users (physicians and sonographers) are about 20% of the way there in knowledge using bubbles with ultrasound.

This is a rather graphic illustration of where the biggest hole is in this picture. He stresses that there is ALOT of education that needs to occur prior to contrast agents becoming mainstream. There is also much training that needs to happen.

There certainly is a role for the SDMS in this new arena.

Looking forward to seeing you on Wednesday here in Andover.

Best, Carolyn :)

______________________________ Reply Separator Subject: Re: contrast agents ______________________________ Reply Separator Author: Non-HP-jpbaker (jpbaker@uswest.net) at HP-ColSprings,mimegw3 Date: 8/8/98 12:20 AM

Thanks Carolyn there are many important points here. I also think that your 3-5 year anticiapted time may be too generous. Most contrasts are due to be approved this year or very early next, so I think the issue of who can and who cannot inject these "drugs" will be less than 3 years away.

We are working on the scope of practice with this issue in mind. The SDMS should be prepared to lead the way in training in IV's. The question is how to go about that? We need to get in touch with Nuc Med, which I will do, to find out how this was implemented. I injected isotopes and gave IM injections for B12 and other nuc med studies. I was never trained per se I just did it!! a while ago before the nurses got to realizing that this was an area they could invade. We need to find out wh at is involved today. The ARDMS are going to have to get involved also because testing of competency will be an issue. Another subject for the Summit Sept 15th!! Contrast agents were originally going to be considered a "devise" had that remained the situation it would have been easier. Some companies that were not ready for approval fought this to give themselves more time and got the FDA involved and made this a drug which slowed everything down but also made a difference as far as who and how this could be administered!!

CAROLYN_ALEXANDER@HP-Andover-om3.om.hp.com wrote:

> Hi Laura, > > The only contrast agent that has been approved in the US at this time > is Optison. It is approved only for LV opacification, not perfusion. >

> For now, if a lab is using the the contrast agent for perfusion, they > would be a research lab and therefore an MD (the researcher) would be > present. In our experience, either the researcher or a Fellow is > doing the injections. In some cases, where Sonographers are also > RN's, the Sonographers have done the injections. > > In my opinion, injecting contrast would be no different than injecting > thalium for a thalium stress test. It is the Nuclear Medicine tech > that does the injection because they have been trained to start IV's. > > If Sonographers are to take on the role of the one who injects the > contrast agents, they will need to be trained to start IV's. In the > near-term, this probably could/would be done per hospital policy and > proceedure. However, if contrast agents become mainstream in routine > clinical practice for the echo lab (which many predict will happen in > 3-5 years) there is ALOT of education and training that will need to > take place for both Sonographers and MD's. Training Sonographers to > start IV's will be one of the many areas that will need to be > addressed. > > Hope this helps! > Carolyn :) > > > >

______________________________ Reply Separator Non-HP-laura (laura@sdms.org) at HP-ColSprings,uugw3 > Date: 8/6/98 ______________________________ Reply Separator 12:44 PM > > Please help me out. Just wanted to know the liability or legal issues > surrounding contrast agents and who they should be administered by. I had > a gentleman call today inquiring whether or not he could administer a new > contrast agent (Optison?). He is a cardiac sonographer in Louisiana and is > an RDMS/RDCS. I was under the impression that contrast agents needed to be > administered by an RN. Is this correct? > > Thank you. > Laura --------- End forwarded message ----------

Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:39:05 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.