![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Comments about "Fetal head"From: Joseph Allen Worrall Jr. (jworrall@alaska.net)Fri Mar 13 12:04:05 1998
I will refer to the images as they are put up. The image at the top of the bunch, labeled Posterior fossa: That was the first image I looked at, and I thought the suspected mass was the echogenic area at the lateral aspect of the dependant cerebellar lobe. I guess that is just slight angulation on the axial view. The next two side-by-side images appear to be identical to me. I believe the suspected mass is on the upper side, and is being measured in the duel images at the bottom of the stack. After having the benefit of Terry's evaluation, I would say that probably is the thalamus, again an oblique (meaning partially coronal) view. But if I were scanning this patient, and saw that, and could not convince myself by angling the transducer that it was the thalamus, I would be concerned, certainly. In the dependant lateral ventricle the choroid dangles, and I understand the measurement was 11 mm. It certainly looks like very mild enlargement. Several years ago at the AIUM meeting, Dr. Bruce Hall (author of the BABE software program, which I use, and that is why I remember this) presented a series of cases of babies that turned out perfectly normal, but had atrium measurements slightly over 10 mm. I thought I was so clever to take each image as it was sent by Terry, copy it to a Zip disk, then open Paint Shop Pro and open each image on the work space so I could view all images at once. By the time I had done that, Kevin or Bruce had all images up, with improved contrast. Janet, thanks for going to all the trouble of scanning these and presenting them. I will be interested in what others think. Allen Worrall
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:38:45 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.