Re: your opinion
From: dr udayakumar (drudaya@vsnl.com)
Sat Jul 7 21:18:29 2007
This is probably a normal pregnancy that has occurred in a uterus which had
a pre-existing Invasive mole.
History of previous 2 molar pregnancies is hard to ignore.
Dr.Udayakumar
GENESIS SCANS
Chennai, INDIA.
>----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr J.W. van der Slikke" <vdslikke@knmg.nl>
To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net>
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 5:18 AM
Subject: Re: your opinion
>
> The placenta has a rather normal aspect, not mola-like at all. To my
> opinion
> this is could be an extreme case of adenomyosis
>
> http://www.heavybleeding.com/causes1.jpg
>
> Hans
>
> J.W. (Hans) van der Slikke, MD, PhD
> obstetrician/gynaecologist
> VU university medical center
> P.O. Box 7057
> 1007 MB Amsterdam
> The Netherlands
> tel office: +31 20 444 3344
> fax office +31 20 444 1485
> mobile tel +31 621 897 425
>
> _____
>
> From: DuBose, Terry [mailto:DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 8:29 PM
> To: Ultrasound@OBGYN.net; EAB-US-OBGYN
> Cc: Donna Wyant; Barbara Nesbitt; Donna.Wyant@OBGYN.net; nila mohile
> Subject: RE: your opinion
>
> We have a current case on which an opinion is requested. Please take a
> look at this case and let the physician know if you think it is a
> coexisting
> mole/
>
> http://www.obgyn.net/ultrasound/?page=/ultrasound/present/0707/pregnancy_mole
>
> Thanks, Terry
>
> Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM
>
> Associate Professor & Director
> Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program
> University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP
> 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563
> Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA
> 501-686-6510 or 501-686-5948
> DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu
> http://www.uams.edu/chrp/sonography/
> http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm
> http://www.io.com/~dubose/
>
> _____
>
> From: Donna Wyant [mailto:Donna_Wyant@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 12:37 PM
> To: DuBose, Terry; 'nila mohile'
> Cc: 'Donna Wyant'; 'Barbara Nesbitt'
> Subject: RE: your opinion
>
> Hi Terry,
>
> Here is the page for you. Let me know if you would like any changes made.
> http://www.obgyn.net/ultrasound/?page=/ultrasound/present/0707/pregnancy_mole
>
> Donna
>
> Donna Wyant
> Special Sections Content Coordinator
> OBGYN.net http://www.obgyn.net <http://www.obgyn.net/>
> Donna.Wyant@obgyn.net
>
> From: DuBose, Terry [mailto:DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:39 AM
> To: nila mohile
> Cc: Donna Wyant; donna.wyant@obgyn.net; Barbara Nesbitt
> Subject: RE: your opinion
>
> Dr. Mohile, it certainly does look like a co-existing mole. however, let
> us
> post it and get more opinions.
>
> Donna, can you post these images right away and let me have the URL so we
> can call for opinions. I have already clipped the patient's ID. Please
> use this text:
>
> "Please opine on this usg.G4P1 with 2 previous vesicular moles has 16
> weeks
> live foetus, normal looking placenta and fluid. Entire myometrium shows
> change almost like mole, which is highly unlikely. So is this mole? Please
> help.
>
> Dr. Mohile nilamohile@hotmail.com
>
> Thanks, Terry
>
> _____
>
> From: nila mohile [mailto:nilamohile@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 2:24 PM
> To: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
> Subject: your opinion
>
> Dear Dr. Dubose,
>
> I could not send this mail to ultrasound forum and hence directing to
> you.Please opine on this usg.G4P1 with 2 previous vesicular moles has 16
> weeks live foetus, normal looking placenta and fluid.Entire myometrium
> shows
> change almost like mole, which is highly unlikely. So is this mole? Please
> help.
>
> Dr. Mohile.
>
> _____
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
> and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> message.
>
