Re: your opinion
From: Dragos Nemescu (dnemescu@iasi.mednet.ro)
Sat Jul 7 01:32:54 2007
hello,
because there are changes on both sides of uterus, right and left, and
placenta is posterior, an invasive mole is unlikely.
could be structural changes in myometrium due to pregnancy.
a clip with doppler and other views, to see its extend will help.
--
Dragos Nemescu MD
Iasi, Romania
Quoting "DuBose, Terry" <DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu>:
> We have a current case on which an opinion is requested. Please take a
> look at this case and let the physician know if you think it is a coexisting
> mole/
>
> http://www.obgyn.net/ultrasound/?page=/ultrasound/present/0707/pregnancy_mole
>
> Thanks, Terry
>
> Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM
>
> Associate Professor & Director
> Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program
> University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP
> 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563
> Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA
> 501-686-6510 or 501-686-5948
> DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu
> http://www.uams.edu/chrp/sonography/
> http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm
> http://www.io.com/~dubose/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> ________________________________
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Donna Wyant [mailto:Donna_Wyant@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 12:37 PM
> To: DuBose, Terry; 'nila mohile'
> Cc: 'Donna Wyant'; 'Barbara Nesbitt'
> Subject: RE: your opinion
>
> Hi Terry,
>
> Here is the page for you. Let me know if you would like any changes made.
> http://www.obgyn.net/ultrasound/?page=/ultrasound/present/0707/pregnancy_mole
>
> Donna
>
> Donna Wyant
> Special Sections Content Coordinator
> OBGYN.net http://www.obgyn.net <http://www.obgyn.net/>
> Donna.Wyant@obgyn.net
>
> From: DuBose, Terry [mailto:DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:39 AM
> To: nila mohile
> Cc: Donna Wyant; donna.wyant@obgyn.net; Barbara Nesbitt
> Subject: RE: your opinion
>
> Dr. Mohile, it certainly does look like a co-existing mole... however, let us
> post it and get more opinions.
>
> Donna, can you post these images right away and let me have the URL so we can
> call for opinions. I have already clipped the patient's ID. Please use
> this text:
>
> "Please opine on this usg.G4P1 with 2 previous vesicular moles has 16 weeks
> live foetus, normal looking placenta and fluid. Entire myometrium shows
> change almost like mole, which is highly unlikely. So is this mole? Please
> help.
> Dr. Mohile nilamohile@hotmail.com "
>
> Thanks, Terry
>
> Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM
>
> Associate Professor & Director
> Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program
> University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP
> 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563
> Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA
> 501-686-6510 or 501-686-5948
> DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu
> http://www.uams.edu/chrp/sonography/
> http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm
> http://www.io.com/~dubose/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> ________________________________
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: nila mohile [mailto:nilamohile@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 2:24 PM
> To: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
> Subject: your opinion
>
> Dear Dr. Dubose,
> I could not send this mail to ultrasound forum and hence directing to
> you.Please opine on this usg.G4P1 with 2 previous vesicular moles has 16
> weeks live foetus, normal looking placenta and fluid.Entire myometrium shows
> change almost like mole, which is highly unlikely. So is this mole? Please
> help.
> Dr. Mohile.
>
> ________________________________
>
> ________________________________
> Sign in and get updated with all the action! Formula One
> <http://content.msn.co.in/Sports/FormulaOne/Default>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
> and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> message.
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
> attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
> may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
> reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
