|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: your opinionFrom: DoctorJoe@aol.comFri Jul 6 20:04:08 2007
> We have a current case on which an opinion is requested. Please take a > look at this case and let the physician know if you think it is a coexisting > mole/ > > http://www.obgyn.net/ultrasound/?page=/ultrasound/present/0707/pregnancy_mole > I guess I differentiate the normal-appearing placenta at one end and the molar-appearing structure at the other, plus the fetus, and vote for a normal fetus and placenta with coexistant molar or perhaps trisomic placenta and absent twin. They look too "separate" to me to be the same fetus. I'd love to see the movie. Joe P.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Sat Aug 2 05:14:09 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.