-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: your opinion From: Dr J.W. van der Slikke (vdslikke@knmg.nl) Fri Jul 6 18:47:02 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: your opinion" Previous message: Mário Libardi: "Re: Pregnancy mole" The placenta has a rather normal aspect, not mola-like at all. To my opinion this is could be an extreme case of adenomyosis http://www.heavybleeding.com/causes1.jpg Hans J.W. (Hans) van der Slikke, MD, PhD obstetrician/gynaecologist VU university medical center P.O. Box 7057 1007 MB Amsterdam The Netherlands tel office: +31 20 444 3344 fax office +31 20 444 1485 mobile tel +31 621 897 425 _____ From: DuBose, Terry [mailto:DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 8:29 PM To: Ultrasound@OBGYN.net; EAB-US-OBGYN Cc: Donna Wyant; Barbara Nesbitt; Donna.Wyant@OBGYN.net; nila mohile Subject: Re: your opinion We have a current case on which an opinion is requested. Please take a look at this case and let the physician know if you think it is a coexisting mole/ http://www.obgyn.net/ultrasound/?page=/ultrasound/present/0707/pregnancy_mole Thanks, Terry Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM Associate Professor & Director Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563 Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA 501-686-6510 or 501-686-5948 DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu http://www.uams.edu/chrp/sonography/ http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm http://www.io.com/~dubose/ _____ From: Donna Wyant [mailto:Donna_Wyant@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 12:37 PM To: DuBose, Terry; 'nila mohile' Cc: 'Donna Wyant'; 'Barbara Nesbitt' Subject: Re: your opinion Hi Terry, Here is the page for you. Let me know if you would like any changes made. http://www.obgyn.net/ultrasound/?page=/ultrasound/present/0707/pregnancy_mole Donna -- Donna Wyant Special Sections Content Coordinator OBGYN.net http://www.obgyn.net <http://www.obgyn.net/> Donna.Wyant@obgyn.net From: DuBose, Terry [mailto:DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:39 AM To: nila mohile Cc: Donna Wyant; donna.wyant@obgyn.net; Barbara Nesbitt Subject: Re: your opinion Dr. Mohile, it certainly does look like a co-existing mole. however, let us post it and get more opinions. Donna, can you post these images right away and let me have the URL so we can call for opinions. I have already clipped the patient's ID. Please use this text: "Please opine on this usg.G4P1 with 2 previous vesicular moles has 16 weeks live foetus, normal looking placenta and fluid. Entire myometrium shows change almost like mole, which is highly unlikely. So is this mole? Please help. Dr. Mohile nilamohile@hotmail.com Thanks, Terry _____ From: nila mohile [mailto:nilamohile@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 2:24 PM To: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Subject: your opinion Dear Dr. Dubose, I could not send this mail to ultrasound forum and hence directing to you.Please opine on this usg.G4P1 with 2 previous vesicular moles has 16 weeks live foetus, normal looking placenta and fluid.Entire myometrium shows change almost like mole, which is highly unlikely. So is this mole? Please help. Dr. Mohile. _____ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Next message: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: your opinion" Previous message: Mário Libardi: "Re: Pregnancy mole"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:37:07 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.