|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Nuchal cordFrom: Allen Worrall (jworrall@alaska.net)Sun Jul 17 15:19:01 2005
Latha, sorry to be so late in answering - your message got diverted to my SPAM list, and I just checked the list and found your messages. By all means quote me if you wish. Allen
> ----- Original Message ----- Thanks Allen. So I will after all have the chance of putting the monkey off my back. Can I quote u in my debate as one with a certain point of view ? LN.
> ----- Original Message ----- Keeping in mind that medical liability issues are a major concern here in the US, here is the way I look at it. There is no doubt that the evidence indicates that the nuchal cord rarely causes problems. Because of that, many sonologists feel that it need not be reported because of the anxiety it causes in the patient and her obstetrical provider. In the third trimester I report nuchal cords. Although the nuchal cord rarely causes problems, sometimes it does cause a problem. I video tape my exams. If I see a nuchal cord in the third trimester (when it is more likely to be present when labor starts, compared to a 2nd trimester nuchal cord) and do not report it, and the nuchal cord does cause fetal anoxia, and the patient sues, and my video tape is obtained by the plaintiff attorney, and the nuchal cord is clearly seen, the obstetrician will point to me as the guilty party. The obstetrician's position will be that if she knew the nuchal cord was present, she would have had an ultrasound done at the onset of labor, and if the nuchal cord was still demonstrated, she would have done a C Section. So in effect, when I report a nuchal cord, I am putting the monkey on the obstetrician's back and taking the monkey off my back. I particularly report a nuchal cord in the third trimester in a breech presentation, or if the back of the fetal neck is near the transducer and I can clearly see that the cord is deeply indenting the skin of the back of the neck. Attempt at external version of breech is common here, and if there is nuchal cord, I doubt the obstetrician would attempt external version. Allen
> ----- Original Message ----- Dear friends, Is there a consensus on reporting of nuchal cord , esp. in the III Trimester ? We have a debate on this topic next week. Any help on this topic will be appreciated. Please give your inputs - personal experiences and view-points. Thanks, LN. Bangalore, India
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:36:36 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.