Re: 3D ultrasound poised to revolutionize pelvic imaging

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Tue Jun 28 07:06:13 2005


Is there any possibility of either accessing the article sans the annoying registration page or posting the article here? I heard Beryl speak at this yr's AIUM - 3D is clearly more than cute baby pix.

art

At Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Allen Worrall wrote: >
>Bouthina Ibrahim: Here's a good 3D article: Cheryl Vance bouthina
>ibrahim wrote: THANK YOU SO MUCH CAN YOU DOWNLOAD SOME INTERESTING 3D
>INTERESTING CASES. Cheryl Vance wrote: Terry: That's a very interesting
>concept. I haven't heard of anyone doing it (that remotely) for
>ultrasound yet either...but it's likely to be commonplace in
>ultrasound's future. I don't mean to sound like a GE commercial, but
>something like this is already feasible due to GE's raw data acquisition
>capabilities. GE's ultrasound systems acquire their images in raw data
>meaning that they are fully manipulable even after the exam is
>completed/stored. Because of this capability, GE's ultrasound images can
>be sent to a LOGIQworks (type of workstation connected to PACS) for
>viewing/manipulating after the patient has left. In fact, GE is
>currently testing benefits of this technology for enhancing productivity
>in ultrasound departments (see attached white paper on Volume Imaging
>Protocol VIP). Basically VIP uses GE's raw data technology to take cine
>clips of anatomy, then once the patient has left manipulation can take
>place (viewing the anatomy in various sectional planes -
>sag/trans/coronal/oblique, changing the contrast resolution, etc.). This
>gives the int! erpreting physician the dynamic viewing capability that
>is just not possible on stored single frame images. The interpreting
>physicians feel like they are actually scanning the patient (via the
>cine clips), and beyond that, they can manipulate the data to view any
>oblique plane rather than only viewing the planes the originally
>sonographer saved. But I see it going beyond routine VIP imaging at an
>individual hospital...taking bouthina ibrahim's proposal one step
>further...the manipulable ultrasound data could be sent to viewing
>stations across the nation/globe for interpretation thereby allowing the
>on-site physicians to be able to perform more "hands-on" procedures. It
>would also give the off-site interpreters (like bouthina ibrahim) much
>more confidence while they view the study on-line. As for the legal
>issues...using this technology is the same within a hospital setting as
>it would be across the world. The only difference is how far away the
>interpreting physician is (which in the world of TeleRadiology doesn't
>pose a problem so it shouldn't in this setting either-right?). These of
>course are just my opinions. Please note - I now work for GE Healthcare
>now so my viewpoint may be a little skewed. I am just so excited about
>the future of ultrasound! Cheryl Vance, MA, RDMS, RVT GE Applications
>Specialist Terry DuBose wrote: Humm, interesting. I think you are the
>first to offer outsourced sonographic interpretations here. While I am
>not looking for that service, personally, it does peak my interest. How
>do you see this working in the medical-legal situation in USA medicine?
>Particularly since obstetric practice is so litigious in the USA.
>Interesting subject. Anyone have thoughts on this? Thanks, Terry
>bouthina ibrahim wrote: YES WITH PLEASURE I CAN DO ULTRASOUND
>INTERPRETATION AND REPORTING. "DuBose, Terry" wrote: bouthina ibrahim I
>have seen several messages from you similar to this one. I am unclear as
>to what you are trying to communicate. Do you want to do sonographic
>interpretation and reporting? Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM
>Associate Professor & Director Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program
>University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP 4301 West Markham St.
>Mail Slot #563 Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA 501-686-6510
>DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu http://www.io.com/~dubose/
>http://www.uams.edu/chrp/dms/default.asp
>http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>Behalf Of bouthina ibrahim Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 11:40 AM To:
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: ARDMS Earns ANSI-ISO
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>17024 Accreditation bouthina ibrahim wrote: thank you so much iam
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>consultant radiologist post frcr london and mdrd alexanderia iam
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>interested in ultrasound general and doppleriam follow ofamerican
>instituteof ultrasound in medicin my no127764
> <http://www.auntminnie.com/images/logos/logo_58_59.gif>
>
>3D ultrasound poised to revolutionize pelvic imaging
>Now that 3D technology provides ultrasound with reconstructed views, the
>modality may be poised for a major role in cross-sectional pelvic
>imaging, recouping some exams that had been relegated to CT or MRI,
>according to Dr. Beryl Benacerraf.
>Click Here to view article
><http://www.auntminnie.com/redirect/redirect.asp?ItemID=62905>
>
>This article was sent to you from cheryl1vance@yahoo.com by
>AuntMinnie.com. Click Here <http://www.auntminnie.com> to go to the
>AuntMinnie Homepage.

--
art fougner, md

"If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else." Lawrence Peter Berra




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:36:34 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.