-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Uterine vs ovarian From: Dr. Fazeel (fazeel@abt.wol.net.pk) Wed Jun 15 12:20:44 2005 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: DuBose, Terry: "Re: Uterine vs ovarian" Previous message: Dr. Fazeel: "Re: AIUM and my new book" Maybe in reply to: Suzy: "Uterine vs ovarian" Next in thread: DuBose, Terry: "Re: Uterine vs ovarian" Dear Terry, please allow pictures in emails and make it simple to upload and interesting by just simple email reply, carrying pics and words. fazeel -------Original Message------- From: DuBose, Terry Date: 06/14/05 16:01:30 To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Uterine vs ovarian Dr. Smeltzer, this sounds like a great case for posting on OBGYN.net... very educational... We have had a real drop off in case presentations over the last couple of years... please consider submitting a case. Thanks Terry Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM Associate Professor & Director Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563 Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA 501-686-6510 DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/chrp/dms/default.asp http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm --------------------------------------------------------------- =0D --------------------------------------------------------------- =0D --------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net >mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net">ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn net] On Behalf Of James Smeltzer Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 11:04 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Uterine vs ovarian Hi, Just had a case of massive (10 cm) edema of a normal ovary with a partial torsion. Appearance was so bizarre and massive, and with a very LOW RI I thought it was a solid tumor. With a partial torsion, downstream from obstruction, you get (in carotids AND leg arteries AND ovaries) less pulsatile flow because you are observing low resistance runoff below the dam, and the tissue perfused is vasodilated because of the proximal obstruction. THis can be confused with a cancer flow signature - as I was confused. She had the ovary out. I believe that the partial torsion was primary. With total obstruction and infarction you get no flow. Trace the infundibulopelvic artery & vein with the color or power (if color not sensitive enough) on to show the vessels and the twisting of the partial torsion - at least this is what I plan to have sonographers do NEXT time they find massive ovarian size + low RI of the ovary. ;^}. Isn't ultrasound great - doing it 20 years and still get surprised.... Jim S James S. Smeltzer, MD, FACOG, SMFM Consultant, Maternal Fetal Medicine Wellstar Physicians' Group Northwest Women's Care 787 Campbell Hill St Marietta GA 30060 James.Smeltzer@wellstar.org VM 678-290-3035 Off 770-528-0260 Page 404-318-3451 >>> suzyhny@yahoo.com 6/13/2005 8:09:23 PM >>> Hi Everybody The only experience I have had with uterine and ovarian arteries is when I do ovarian doppler intravaginally to r/o torsion. I have been told by a radiologist that the ovary is fed by both the uterine and ovarian arteries. To tell the difference is to recognize the diastolic notch in the uterine art. Just because we see uterine arterial flow within the ovary does not mean that the ovarian artery is not torsed. Generally if I see ovarian flow from the ovarian artery in the ovsry, then it's safe to say there's no torsion. Please enlighten me if this is not correct. Suzy Hettena RDMS Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM & more. Check it out! >>>>>>>>>>>>> Confidentiality Disclaimer <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. ========================== -- ============== Next message: DuBose, Terry: "Re: Uterine vs ovarian" Previous message: Dr. Fazeel: "Re: AIUM and my new book" Maybe in reply to: Suzy: "Uterine vs ovarian" Next in thread: DuBose, Terry: "Re: Uterine vs ovarian"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:19:56 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.