|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Triple screening in CaliforniaFrom: Michael Gorman (gormanm@fcm.ucsf.edu)Sun Jun 12 02:53:26 2005
At Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Joseph A Worrall wrote: > >To Onebornjoy: I hope someone from California will answer this. It is my >understanding (and I may be wrong) that there is a law in the State of >California that requires that all pregnant women have serum testing for >aneuploidy +ACY- NTD during their pregnancy. This has been in effect for a >number of years, and thus there is a good deal of data available. I believe >the labs that do the serum testing have to be certified by the State of >California, there are prescribed protocols for followup of results. I seems >to me I heard somewhere that when ultrasound is part of the protocols, that >only certain ultrasound labs can be used. > >We also have laws that require testing of newborns for phenylketoneuria, and >we have laws that require treatment of newborns eyes to prevent neonatal >ophthalmia, etc. I guess you could argue that any law passed to protect the >public health is an invasion of someone's rights. > >-- >Joseph A Worrall MD RDMS >
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:19:56 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.