Re: JAMA article

From: Dave Berck (djberck@yahoo.com)
Fri Jan 14 15:01:33 2005


Agreed. I guess I'm skeptical that any patient will rely on a mall-scan and not have the one ordinarily covered by their insurance. I'm much more worried about the Ob-Gyn who does a scan in the office but knows nothing about ultrasound. Talk about false reassurance! That's the real threat to those who take ultrasound seriously.

--- Allen Worrall <jworrall@alaska.net> wrote:

> No free scans from my ultrasound practice. The
> obstetricians will sometimes
> use a small old portable machine for a quick look.
> They do not charge and do
> not do a real prenatal examination.
>
> I suppose some practices that charge a global
> obstetrical fee include the
> ultrasounds in that global fee. We do not do it that
> way.
>
> Allen

>> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Berck" <djberck@yahoo.com>
> To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND"
> <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net>
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 1:16 PM
> Subject: RE: JAMA article
>
> > Has anyone seen a case of a patient having a
> keepsake
> > ultrasound at the mall and then not having a
> > diagnostic ultrasound? This seems farfetched to
> me.
> > Those willing to shell out cash for a mall scan
> are
> > probably going to show up for the free one at the
> > doctor's office.
> >
> > --- "DuBose, Terry" <DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> I think Dr. Jeanty is correct. Patients are
> more
> >> likely to sue if they
> >> are unhappy or believe the practitioner is hiding
> >> something
> >> (incompetence?).
> >>
> >> This non-medical use of sonography is going to be
> a
> >> continuing problem
> >> until we have some kind of licensure for all
> >> sonographic operators. As
> >> photography and cinematography have developed,
> one
> >> of the first things
> >> that people have pointed their cameras at are
> their
> >> children. First, the
> >> Kodak box, then 35mm, 8mm home movies, video, now
> >> digital images and
> >> video clips of the grandchildren zip around the
> >> world. Sonography,
> >> apparently, is no different.
> >>
> >> Because we have done such a good job over the
> last
> >> 30 years of
> >> convincing the public that ultrasound is not
> >> dangerous to their progeny,
> >> we now have this problem of the uneducated and
> >> unwashed doing fetal
> >> imaging in the malls. The real problem is that
> the
> >> unsuspecting public
> >> may have no idea if the operator has any clue of
> >> what they are doing,
> >> and may believe that is all the prenatal care
> they
> >> need.
> >>
> >> As objectionable as regulation is to many, it
> >> appears that may be the
> >> only solution,... or "Caveat Emptor: Let the
> Buyer
> >> Beware".
> >>
> >> Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM
> >>
> >> Associate Professor & Director
> >> Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program
> >> University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP
> >> 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563
> >> Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA
> >> 501-686-6510
> >> DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu
> >> http://www.io.com/~dubose/
> >> http://www.uams.edu/chrp/dms/default.asp
> >> http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm
> >>
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------- > >>
--------------------------------------------------------------- > >>

--
---------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ultrasound@obgyn.net
> >> [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
> >> Philippe Jeanty, MD, PhD
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:39 AM
> >> To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> >> Subject: RE: JAMA article
> >>
> >> Sure they have... I do not care the least bit...
> I
> >> have given the full
> >> exam
> >> on tape for the past 26 years. It documents that
> we
> >> have done a thorough
> >> exam. I prefer to practice for the patient then
> for
> >> the lawyer and I
> >> fully
> >> admit I make a lot of misdiagnoses... I have a
> whole
> >> lecture on CD on
> >> this
> >> :)
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ultrasound@obgyn.net
> >> [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
> >> Joe
> >> Cutchin
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:30 AM
> >> To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> >> Subject: Re: JAMA article
> >>
> >> Wonder if they have DVD readers in Court?
> >>
> >> "Philippe Jeanty, MD, PhD" wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Yeah all our machines have a DVD burner and we
> >> burn a free DVD to all
> >> > parents who wants one. Works pretty simple.
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: ultrasound@obgyn.net
> >> [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
> >> Brooke
> >> > Cregor
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 12:20 PM
> >> > To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> >> > Subject: RE: JAMA article
> >> >
> >> > Art,
> >> >
> >> > Geddes Keepsake seems to address a market
> demand
> >> from expectant
> >> families
> >> to
> >> > show off the fetus to friends and family.
> While
> >> addressing market
> >> demands,
> >> > it is often thought to be unnecessary and
> >> potentially excessive use of
> >> > ultrasound that some feel might interfere with
> the
> >> fetus development.
> >> >
> >> > We have seen a nice cost effective solution
> that
> >> is just hitting the
> >> market
> >> > that allows any Sonographer to address the
> market
> >> demand for both
> >> > physician's electronic medical records, and
> >> potentially keepsake
> >> purposes
> >> > without actually subjecting the fetus to
> >> additional ultrasounds.
> >> >
> >> > This product is a simple addition to any
> >> ultrasound and can be hooked
> >> up
> >> as
> >> > easily as installing a video printer to your
> >> ultrasound.
> >> >
> >> > http://www.medicapture.com/usb100_intro.htm
> >> >
> >> > Any thoughts on this solution as an alternative
> to
> >> a strictly keepsake
> >> > company run by potentially unqualified
> >> sonographers?
> >> >
> >> > Brooke
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: ultrasound@obgyn.net
> >> [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
> >> art
> >> > fougner, md
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 11:57 AM
> >> > To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> >> > Subject: JAMA article
> >> >
> >> > The 1/05/2005 edition of the JAMA ( not
> available
> >> online as yet)
> >> covers
> >> > the issue of "Entertainment OB Sonography.  One
> of
> >> the key points is
> >> > that amusement and diagnosis may not be
> mutually
> >> exclusive.  Berkeley
> >> > Geddes, an originator of online job search site
> >> FlipDog.com, started
> >> > Geddes Keepsake Inc as a way to incoporate
> >> "keepsake" services into
> >> > Diagnostic Labs.  More info to be found here -
> >> http://www.geddeskeepsake.com.
> >> >
> >> > oh - just want to say that i am in no way
> >> affiliated with Geddes.  Any
> >> > thoughts?
> >> >
> >> > art
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > art fougner, md
> >> > May the Joy of this Holiday Season Be with You
> >> > and Yours throughout the New Year.
> >>
> >> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message,
> >> including any attachments, is for the sole use of
> >> the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> >> confidential and privileged information.  Any
> >> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
> distribution
> >> is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
> >> recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> e-mail
> >> and destroy all copies of the original message.
> >>
> >
> > =====
> > David J. Berck, MD, MPH
> >
>

===== David J. Berck, MD, MPH




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:32:33 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.