![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: JAMA articleFrom: Dave Berck (djberck@yahoo.com)Fri Jan 14 15:01:33 2005
Agreed. I guess I'm skeptical that any patient will rely on a mall-scan and not have the one ordinarily covered by their insurance. I'm much more worried about the Ob-Gyn who does a scan in the office but knows nothing about ultrasound. Talk about false reassurance! That's the real threat to those who take ultrasound seriously. --- Allen Worrall <jworrall@alaska.net> wrote:
> No free scans from my ultrasound practice. The
>> ----- Original Message ----- -- --------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: ultrasound@obgyn.net > >> [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of > >> Philippe Jeanty, MD, PhD > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:39 AM > >> To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND > >> Subject: RE: JAMA article > >> > >> Sure they have... I do not care the least bit... > I > >> have given the full > >> exam > >> on tape for the past 26 years. It documents that > we > >> have done a thorough > >> exam. I prefer to practice for the patient then > for > >> the lawyer and I > >> fully > >> admit I make a lot of misdiagnoses... I have a > whole > >> lecture on CD on > >> this > >> :) > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: ultrasound@obgyn.net > >> [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of > >> Joe > >> Cutchin > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:30 AM > >> To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND > >> Subject: Re: JAMA article > >> > >> Wonder if they have DVD readers in Court? > >> > >> "Philippe Jeanty, MD, PhD" wrote: > >> > > >> > Yeah all our machines have a DVD burner and we > >> burn a free DVD to all > >> > parents who wants one. Works pretty simple. > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: ultrasound@obgyn.net > >> [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of > >> Brooke > >> > Cregor > >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 12:20 PM > >> > To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND > >> > Subject: RE: JAMA article > >> > > >> > Art, > >> > > >> > Geddes Keepsake seems to address a market > demand > >> from expectant > >> families > >> to > >> > show off the fetus to friends and family. > While > >> addressing market > >> demands, > >> > it is often thought to be unnecessary and > >> potentially excessive use of > >> > ultrasound that some feel might interfere with > the > >> fetus development. > >> > > >> > We have seen a nice cost effective solution > that > >> is just hitting the > >> market > >> > that allows any Sonographer to address the > market > >> demand for both > >> > physician's electronic medical records, and > >> potentially keepsake > >> purposes > >> > without actually subjecting the fetus to > >> additional ultrasounds. > >> > > >> > This product is a simple addition to any > >> ultrasound and can be hooked > >> up > >> as > >> > easily as installing a video printer to your > >> ultrasound. > >> > > >> > http://www.medicapture.com/usb100_intro.htm > >> > > >> > Any thoughts on this solution as an alternative > to > >> a strictly keepsake > >> > company run by potentially unqualified > >> sonographers? > >> > > >> > Brooke > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: ultrasound@obgyn.net > >> [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of > >> art > >> > fougner, md > >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 11:57 AM > >> > To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND > >> > Subject: JAMA article > >> > > >> > The 1/05/2005 edition of the JAMA ( not > available > >> online as yet) > >> covers > >> > the issue of "Entertainment OB Sonography. One > of > >> the key points is > >> > that amusement and diagnosis may not be > mutually > >> exclusive. Berkeley > >> > Geddes, an originator of online job search site > >> FlipDog.com, started > >> > Geddes Keepsake Inc as a way to incoporate > >> "keepsake" services into > >> > Diagnostic Labs. More info to be found here - > >> http://www.geddeskeepsake.com. > >> > > >> > oh - just want to say that i am in no way > >> affiliated with Geddes. Any > >> > thoughts? > >> > > >> > art > >> > > >> > -- > >> > art fougner, md > >> > May the Joy of this Holiday Season Be with You > >> > and Yours throughout the New Year. > >> > >> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, > >> including any attachments, is for the sole use of > >> the intended recipient(s) and may contain > >> confidential and privileged information. Any > >> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > distribution > >> is prohibited. If you are not the intended > >> recipient, please contact the sender by reply > e-mail > >> and destroy all copies of the original message. > >> > > > > ===== > > David J. Berck, MD, MPH > > >
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:32:33 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.