Re: Abruptio placenta and ultrasound diagnosis

From: DuBose, Terry (DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu)
Tue Jan 11 11:51:23 2005


Here at UAMS we use the ALI PACS. The machines are connected through the university LAN to a central server with a large "Jukebox" of magnetoptical disks. While we use the ALI system, I have no other financial connection with them... for more info see: http://www.mckesson.com/releases/2002/070802_221890159.htm

We can save JPG or TIFF static images, or short video clips to the server. The system also accommodates teaching files for the faculty. It is not perfect, but works. Sonographers on the system can call a physician at another site and they can both look and discuss the case. The images only exist as digital images, and the quality for lectures is as good as the original.

Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM

Associate Professor & Director Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563 Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA 501-686-6510 DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/chrp/dms/default.asp http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- --------------------------------------------------------------- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Brooke Cregor Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 10:52 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Abruptio placenta and ultrasound diagnosis

Terry,

Please let me know how you are digitizing these ultrasound images so that you can send them via email. Are these images scanned in or are you using a device that connects directly to your ultrasound machine that automatically converts the images to jpg, dicom, bmp? I am curious as the MediCapture unit from http://www.medicapture.com <http://www.medicapture.com/> seems to be a nice cost effective solution. We are looking into it as a solution now, but would really like to get real users feedback on the usability. I am just curious if you are using it and have any feedback on it's use.

It seems like a simple device designed with the sonographer in mind. One big plus was that it seemed to be featured on the July 04 cover page of OR today http://www.mdpublishing.com/ORToday/CorpProfiles/04/Jul.htm

Regards,

Brooke

________________________________

From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of

--
________________________________
DuBose, Terry
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 10:14 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
Subject: Re: Abruptio placenta and ultrasound diagnosis

Did the article discuss the certifications, education, or experience of the sonographic operators? Seems that may make a difference in the outcomes.

I think, unfortunately, that many without adequate experience or formal education in sonography pay little attention to the hypoechoic subplacental vascular bed. Attached is an image of a normal placenta with the normal hypoechoic subplacental vascular bed demonstrated in the fundus. The appearance may vary, especially if associated with a focal contraction. There are also photos of the subplacental bed, some with color Doppler, and discussion in DuBose: Fetal Sonography, W. B. Saunders, 1996, p. 352-357.

Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM

Associate Professor & Director

Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP

4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563

Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA

501-686-6510

DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu

http://www.io.com/~dubose/

http://www.uams.edu/chrp/dms/default.asp

http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm

---------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of art fougner, md Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 7:33 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Abruptio placenta and ultrasound diagnosis

>From :J Ultrasound Med. 2002 Aug;21(8):837-40.

Clinical utility of sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of

placental abruption.

Glantz C, Purnell L.

Of 55 patients who gave birth within 14 days of sonography, 8 (15%) had

scans consistent with abruption, and 29 (53%) had abruption at delivery;

the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive

values of sonography were 24%, 96%, 88%, and 53%, respectively. Positive

sonographic findings were univariately associated with 2- to 3-fold

greater subsequent tocolysis, betamethasone use, duration of

hospitalization, follow-up sonograms, preterm delivery, low birth

weight, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. All but low birth

weight and neonatal intensive care unit admission remained independently

significant after adjustment for gestational age (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS:

Sonography is not sensitive for detection of placental abruption, but a

positive finding is associated with more aggressive management and worse

neonatal outcome.

art

At Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Raul Limos wrote:

>

>I had a service patient who had a routine obstectric scan about 6 days

>ago and everything was normal and came to the hospital yesterday for

>bouts of diarrhea. The resident obstetrician checked the baby for

>fetal well being and the baby had fetal bradycardia. On emergency

>c-section they found out that there was an abruption placenta of about

>50%. The APGAR Score of the baby was 0 and presently

On ventilator.

>

>My question is did I miss the abruptio or the diarrhea precipitated

>this event? I am trying to retrieve the films we took from the patient

>for review as we routinely take pictures of the placenta.

--

art fougner, md

"If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else."

Lawrence Peter Berra

---------------------------------

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, --------------------------------- is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain --------------------------------- confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:36:22 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.