Nuchal Cord Redux

From: DR. JOE ANTONY (joeantony@HotPOP.com)
Thu Dec 30 20:43:04 2004


This is a very important observation. ----------------------------------------------- Joe. -----------------------------------------------

>----- Original Message -----
From: "art fougner, md" <evsono@pipeline.com> To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 9:20 PM Subject: Re: Nuchal Cord Redux

> be careful about statements of 100% accuracy - thus far, i've never come
> across a medical test with a 100% predictive value - including the
> diagnosis of death. we still argue about the JFK autopsy. also, if you
> check out the authors' cv's, they do seem to be "good people", doubtless
> using "good equipment".
>
> Happy 2005
>
> art
>
> At Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Mario Libardi wrote:
> >
> >I agree 100% with Dr.Fazeel.
> >
> >Congrats
> >Mario Libardi, MD
> >Brasil
> >
> >> nuchal cord (presence or absence) detection rate should be
> >
> >100% in good
> >> hands and good machines with doppler.
> >>
> >> fazeel
> >>
> >> -------Original Message-------
> >>
> >> From: art fougner, mdDate: 12/29/04 18:19:12
> >> To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND
> >> Subject: Nuchal Cord Redux
> >>
> >> >From the White Journal Early View ( pre-release)...
> >>
> >> Ultrasound detection of nuchal cord prior to labor
> >
> >induction and the
> >> risk of Cesarean section
> >> E. Peregrine, P. O'Brien, E. Jauniaux
> >> Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University
> >
> >College London
> >> Hospitals, London, UK
> >>
> >> Abstract
> >>
> >> Objectives
> >> To investigate the ability of ultrasound to detect the
> >
> >presence of a
> >> nuchal cord immediately prior to induction of labor and the
> >association
> >> of its presence with delivery by Cesarean section.
> >>
> >> Methods
> >> A transabdominal ultrasound scan using gray-scale and color
> >Doppler
> >> imaging was performed immediately prior to induction of
> >
> >labor in 289
> >> women in a prospective study to assess the presence of a
> >
> >nuchal cord.
> >> The presence of a nuchal cord was classified as present,
> >
> >absent or
> >> uncertain. The outcomes of labor, delivery and the neonates
> >were
> >> obtained from the patient notes after delivery.
> >>
> >> Results
> >> A nuchal cord was present at 18% of deliveries. The
> >
> >incidence was not
> >> affected by parity, fetal position or reduced amniotic
> >
> >fluid volume. The
> >> sensitivity of ultrasound in diagnosing a nuchal cord was
> >
> >37.5%, with
> >> specificity, positive and negative predictive values of
> >
> >80%, 29% and
> >> 85%, respectively. The presence of a nuchal cord did not
> >
> >significantly
> >> increase the risk of delivery by Cesarean section (35% vs.
> >
> >28%;
> >> relative risk = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.80-1.87), instrumental
> >
> >delivery for
> >> fetal distress, an abnormal cardiotocograph in labor or at
> >
> >delivery, an
> >> Apgar score < 7 at 1 min, arterial cord pH < 7.1 or
> >
> >neonatal unit
> >> admission.
> >>
> >> Conclusions
> >> The sensitivity of the ultrasound diagnosis of a nuchal
> >
> >cord is low
> >> prior to induction of labor at term. A nuchal cord does not
> >appear to
> >> increase the risk of Cesarean section or of poor neonatal
> >
> >outcome. The
> >> low ultrasound detection rate of a nuchal cord limits its
> >
> >use in
> >> decision making prior to induction of labor in high-risk
> >
> >pregnancies.
> >> Copyright © 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
> >>
> >> art
> >>
> >> --
> >> art fougner, md
> >> May the Joy of this Holiday Season Be with You
> >> and Yours throughout the New Year.
> >>
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
> >Acabe com aquelas janelinhas que pulam na sua tela.
>__________________________________________________________________________
> >
> >--
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
> >AntiPop-up UOL - É grátis!
>__________________________________________________________________________
> >http://antipopup.uol.com.br/
> >
>
> --
> art fougner, md
> May the Joy of this Holiday Season Be with You
> and Yours throughout the New Year.




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 05:19:44 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.